Browse by Attribute

Case Study > Land Use : mining operations or religious/cultural sites or urban

Click on one or more items below to narrow your results.

Natural, Societal & Political Domain Variables:

- Assets (24) - Ecosystems (18) - Governance (33) - Values and Norms (17) - Water Quality (26) - Water Quantity (26)

Climate:

- Arid/desert (Köppen B-type) (13) - Continental (Köppen D-type) (14) - Dry-summer (12) - Dry-winter (7) - Humid mid-latitude (Köppen C-type) (11) - Moist (6) - Moist tropical (Köppen A-type) (10) - Monsoon (9) - Semi-arid/steppe (Köppen B-type) (16) - alpine (5) - cold-climate (permafrost, tundra, polar) (2) - temperate (9)

Land Use: (Click arrow to add another value)

- agricultural- confined livestock operations - agricultural- cropland and pasture - conservation lands - forest land - industrial use - mining operations - rangeland - religious/cultural sites - urban - urban- high density - Other - None

Water Use:

- Agriculture or Irrigation (35) - Domestic/Urban Supply (32) - Fisheries - farmed (3) - Fisheries - wild (13) - Hydropower Generation (21) - Industry - consumptive use (11) - Industry - non-consumptive use (10) - Livestock (6) - Mining/Extraction support (6) - Other Ecological Services (13) - Recreation or Tourism (11)

Stakeholder Type:

- Community or organized citizens (27) - Cultural Interest (4) - Development/humanitarian interest (9) - Environmental interest (24) - Federated state/territorial/provincial government (18) - Industry/Corporate Interest (22) - Local Government (18) - Non-legislative governmental agency (26) - Sovereign state/national/federal government (33) - Supranational union (6)

Key Question:

- How can consultation and cooperation among stakeholders and development partners be better facilitated/managed/fostered? (6) - How can costs for water quality projects be distributed between polluters and beneficiaries? (2) - How can government be dis/incentivized to offer an inclusive planning process? (1) - How can increasing urban water demand be balanced between the needs of the urban population and industry? (1) - How can mutual trust amongst riparians be nurtured? What actions erode that trust? (3) - How do issues of equity and development impact the identification of stakeholders in cases involving hydropower or other revenue generating water infrastructure? (4) - How do national policies influence water use at the local level? (1) - How does asymmetry of power influence water negotiations and how can the negative effects be mitigated? (7) - To what extent can international actors and movements from civil society influence water management? How and when is this beneficial/detrimental and how can these effects be supported/mitigated? (8) - What approaches are most beneficial for rapidly growing cities in the developing world to link water management to sustainable urban growth strategy? (1) - What calculations and considerations should be investigated by countries looking to harness additional hydropower? Which potential outcomes should be investigated or identified? (1) - What considerations can be given to incorporating collaborative adaptive management (CAM)? What efforts have the parties made to review and adjust a solution or decision over time in light of changing conditions? (6) - What effective mechanisms can downstream states/countries use to protect their water related interests/rights? (2) - What kinds of water treaties or agreements between countries can provide sufficient structure and stability to ensure enforceability but also be flexible and adaptable given future uncertainties? (5) - What mechanisms beyond simple allocation can be incorporated into transboundary water agreements to add value and facilitate resolution? (12) - What role(s) can hydropower play in a nation's energy strategy? (1) - What roles can desalination play in a country's national water policy and what energy ecological and water quality considerations ought to go into making such a decision? (1) - What types of benefit sharing models can be used to make desalination more economically feasible and beneficial in water-scarce regions? (1) - Where does the benefit “flow” from a hydropower project and how does that affect implementation and sustainability of the project? (2)

Showing below up to 43 results in range #1 to #43.

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)