Browse by Attribute

Case Study > Land Use : agricultural- confined livestock operations or rangeland

Click on one or more items below to narrow your results.

Natural, Societal & Political Domain Variables:

- Assets (14) - Ecosystems (13) - Governance (20) - Values and Norms (8) - Water Quality (17) - Water Quantity (19)

Climate:

- Arid/desert (Köppen B-type) (7) - Continental (Köppen D-type) (9) - Dry-summer (14) - Dry-winter (7) - Humid mid-latitude (Köppen C-type) (9) - Moist (4) - Moist tropical (Köppen A-type) (6) - Monsoon (5) - Semi-arid/steppe (Köppen B-type) (11) - alpine (3) - cold-climate (permafrost, tundra, polar) (1) - temperate (7)

Land Use: (Click arrow to add another value)

- agricultural- confined livestock operations - agricultural- cropland and pasture - conservation lands - forest land - industrial use - mining operations - rangeland - religious/cultural sites - urban - urban- high density - Other - None

Water Use:

- Agriculture or Irrigation (24) - Domestic/Urban Supply (21) - Fisheries - farmed (1) - Fisheries - wild (6) - Hydropower Generation (14) - Industry - consumptive use (7) - Industry - non-consumptive use (5) - Livestock (5) - Mining/Extraction support (2) - Other Ecological Services (9) - Recreation or Tourism (8)

Stakeholder Type:

- Community or organized citizens (17) - Cultural Interest (6) - Development/humanitarian interest (6) - Environmental interest (14) - Federated state/territorial/provincial government (11) - Industry/Corporate Interest (13) - Local Government (15) - Non-legislative governmental agency (12) - Sovereign state/national/federal government (19) - Supranational union (3)

Key Question:

- How can consultation and cooperation among stakeholders and development partners be better facilitated/managed/fostered? (6) - How can costs for water quality projects be distributed between polluters and beneficiaries? (1) - How can government be dis/incentivized to offer an inclusive planning process? (1) - How can increasing urban water demand be balanced between the needs of the urban population and industry? (1) - How can mutual trust amongst riparians be nurtured? What actions erode that trust? (1) - How do issues of equity and development impact the identification of stakeholders in cases involving hydropower or other revenue generating water infrastructure? (1) - How do national policies influence water use at the local level? (1) - How does asymmetry of power influence water negotiations and how can the negative effects be mitigated? (2) - To what extent can international actors and movements from civil society influence water management? How and when is this beneficial/detrimental and how can these effects be supported/mitigated? (3) - What considerations can be given to incorporating collaborative adaptive management (CAM)? What efforts have the parties made to review and adjust a solution or decision over time in light of changing conditions? (1) - What effective mechanisms can downstream states/countries use to protect their water related interests/rights? (2) - What kinds of water treaties or agreements between countries can provide sufficient structure and stability to ensure enforceability but also be flexible and adaptable given future uncertainties? (3) - What mechanisms beyond simple allocation can be incorporated into transboundary water agreements to add value and facilitate resolution? (9) - What role(s) can hydropower play in a nation's energy strategy? (1) - What role can agricultural subsidies play in finding solutions to complex water management problems? (1) - Where does the benefit “flow” from a hydropower project and how does that affect implementation and sustainability of the project? (2)

Showing below up to 26 results in range #1 to #26.

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)