Browse by Attribute

Case Study > Climate : Monsoon or alpine or temperate

Click on one or more items below to narrow your results.

Natural, Societal & Political Domain Variables:

- Assets (18) - Ecosystems (11) - Governance (21) - Values and Norms (10) - Water Quality (14) - Water Quantity (16)

Climate: (Click arrow to add another value)

- Arid/desert (Köppen B-type) - Continental (Köppen D-type) - Dry-summer - Dry-winter - Humid mid-latitude (Köppen C-type) - Moist - Moist tropical (Köppen A-type) - Monsoon - Semi-arid/steppe (Köppen B-type) - alpine - cold-climate (permafrost, tundra, polar) - temperate - Other - None

Land Use:

- agricultural- confined livestock operations (4) - agricultural- cropland and pasture (21) - conservation lands (7) - forest land (10) - industrial use (15) - mining operations (4) - rangeland (7) - religious/cultural sites (6) - urban (9) - urban- high density (8)

Water Use:

- Agriculture or Irrigation (23) - Domestic/Urban Supply (22) - Fisheries - farmed (3) - Fisheries - wild (8) - Hydropower Generation (15) - Industry - consumptive use (7) - Industry - non-consumptive use (8) - Livestock (5) - Mining/Extraction support (3) - Other Ecological Services (6) - Recreation or Tourism (5)

Stakeholder Type:

- Community or organized citizens (15) - Cultural Interest (3) - Development/humanitarian interest (8) - Environmental interest (12) - Federated state/territorial/provincial government (10) - Industry/Corporate Interest (14) - Local Government (12) - Non-legislative governmental agency (16) - Sovereign state/national/federal government (20) - Supranational union (3)

Key Question:

- How can consultation and cooperation among stakeholders and development partners be better facilitated/managed/fostered? (4) - How can costs for water quality projects be distributed between polluters and beneficiaries? (1) - How can government be dis/incentivized to offer an inclusive planning process? (1) - How can mutual trust amongst riparians be nurtured? What actions erode that trust? (2) - How can packages or options that link issues creatively or build on possible technology innovations be employed to create non-zero sum choices within negotiations that include water resources? (1) - How do issues of equity and development impact the identification of stakeholders in cases involving hydropower or other revenue generating water infrastructure? (4) - How do national policies influence water use at the local level? (1) - How does asymmetry of power influence water negotiations and how can the negative effects be mitigated? (2) - To what extent can international actors and movements from civil society influence water management? How and when is this beneficial/detrimental and how can these effects be supported/mitigated? (6) - What calculations and considerations should be investigated by countries looking to harness additional hydropower? Which potential outcomes should be investigated or identified? (2) - What considerations can be given to incorporating collaborative adaptive management (CAM)? What efforts have the parties made to review and adjust a solution or decision over time in light of changing conditions? (2) - What kinds of water treaties or agreements between countries can provide sufficient structure and stability to ensure enforceability but also be flexible and adaptable given future uncertainties? (3) - What mechanisms beyond simple allocation can be incorporated into transboundary water agreements to add value and facilitate resolution? (8) - What role(s) can hydropower play in a nation's energy strategy? (2) - What role can agricultural subsidies play in finding solutions to complex water management problems? (1) - Where does the benefit “flow” from a hydropower project and how does that affect implementation and sustainability of the project? (3)

Showing below up to 26 results in range #1 to #26.

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)