Browse by Attribute

Case Study > Stakeholder Type: Development/humanitarian interest

Click on one or more items below to narrow your results.

Natural, Societal & Political Domain Variables:

- Assets (15) - Ecosystems (13) - Governance (18) - Values and Norms (12) - Water Quality (15) - Water Quantity (14)

Climate:

- Arid/desert (Köppen B-type) (5) - Continental (Köppen D-type) (3) - Dry-summer (5) - Dry-winter (2) - Humid mid-latitude (Köppen C-type) (4) - Moist (2) - Moist tropical (Köppen A-type) (5) - Monsoon (6) - Semi-arid/steppe (Köppen B-type) (5) - alpine (1) - cold-climate (permafrost, tundra, polar) (1) - temperate (3)

Land Use:

- agricultural- confined livestock operations (4) - agricultural- cropland and pasture (15) - conservation lands (4) - forest land (3) - industrial use (7) - mining operations (1) - rangeland (2) - religious/cultural sites (3) - urban (6) - urban- high density (5)

Water Use:

- Agriculture or Irrigation (14) - Domestic/Urban Supply (15) - Fisheries - farmed (2) - Fisheries - wild (4) - Hydropower Generation (10) - Industry - consumptive use (4) - Industry - non-consumptive use (5) - Livestock (5) - Mining/Extraction support (2) - Other Ecological Services (5) - Recreation or Tourism (1)

Stakeholder Type: (Click arrow to add another value)

- Community or organized citizens - Cultural Interest - Development/humanitarian interest - Environmental interest - Federated state/territorial/provincial government - Industry/Corporate Interest - Local Government - Non-legislative governmental agency - Sovereign state/national/federal government - Supranational union - Other - None

Key Question:

- How can consultation and cooperation among stakeholders and development partners be better facilitated/managed/fostered? (3) - How can costs for water quality projects be distributed between polluters and beneficiaries? (1) - How can government be dis/incentivized to offer an inclusive planning process? (2) - How do issues of equity and development impact the identification of stakeholders in cases involving hydropower or other revenue generating water infrastructure? (2) - How does asymmetry of power influence water negotiations and how can the negative effects be mitigated? (4) - To what extent can international actors and movements from civil society influence water management? How and when is this beneficial/detrimental and how can these effects be supported/mitigated? (4) - What approaches are most beneficial for rapidly growing cities in the developing world to link water management to sustainable urban growth strategy? (1) - What calculations and considerations should be investigated by countries looking to harness additional hydropower? Which potential outcomes should be investigated or identified? (1) - What considerations can be given to incorporating collaborative adaptive management (CAM)? What efforts have the parties made to review and adjust a solution or decision over time in light of changing conditions? (2) - What kinds of water treaties or agreements between countries can provide sufficient structure and stability to ensure enforceability but also be flexible and adaptable given future uncertainties? (2) - What mechanisms beyond simple allocation can be incorporated into transboundary water agreements to add value and facilitate resolution? (5) - What role(s) can hydropower play in a nation's energy strategy? (1) - What roles can desalination play in a country's national water policy and what energy ecological and water quality considerations ought to go into making such a decision? (1) - What types of benefit sharing models can be used to make desalination more economically feasible and beneficial in water-scarce regions? (1) - Where does the benefit “flow” from a hydropower project and how does that affect implementation and sustainability of the project? (1)

Showing below up to 19 results in range #1 to #19.

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)