Browse by Attribute

Case Study > Stakeholder Type: Cultural Interest

Click on one or more items below to narrow your results.

Natural, Societal & Political Domain Variables:

- Assets (5) - Ecosystems (8) - Governance (10) - Values and Norms (9) - Water Quality (10) - Water Quantity (8)

Climate:

- Arid/desert (Köppen B-type) (4) - Continental (Köppen D-type) (3) - Dry-summer (5) - Dry-winter (2) - Humid mid-latitude (Köppen C-type) (2) - Moist (1) - Moist tropical (Köppen A-type) (1) - Semi-arid/steppe (Köppen B-type) (5) - alpine (2) - cold-climate (permafrost, tundra, polar) (1) - temperate (2)

Land Use:

- agricultural- confined livestock operations (2) - agricultural- cropland and pasture (9) - conservation lands (6) - forest land (5) - industrial use (4) - mining operations (1) - rangeland (4) - religious/cultural sites (3) - urban (2) - urban- high density (1)

Water Use:

- Agriculture or Irrigation (8) - Domestic/Urban Supply (8) - Fisheries - wild (3) - Hydropower Generation (5) - Industry - consumptive use (3) - Industry - non-consumptive use (2) - Livestock (3) - Mining/Extraction support (2) - Other Ecological Services (5) - Recreation or Tourism (3)

Stakeholder Type: (Click arrow to add another value)

- Community or organized citizens - Cultural Interest - Development/humanitarian interest - Environmental interest - Federated state/territorial/provincial government - Industry/Corporate Interest - Local Government - Non-legislative governmental agency - Sovereign state/national/federal government - Supranational union - Other - None

Key Question:

- How can consultation and cooperation among stakeholders and development partners be better facilitated/managed/fostered? (3) - How can government be dis/incentivized to offer an inclusive planning process? (2) - How do issues of equity and development impact the identification of stakeholders in cases involving hydropower or other revenue generating water infrastructure? (1) - How does asymmetry of power influence water negotiations and how can the negative effects be mitigated? (1) - To what extent can international actors and movements from civil society influence water management? How and when is this beneficial/detrimental and how can these effects be supported/mitigated? (3) - What considerations can be given to incorporating collaborative adaptive management (CAM)? What efforts have the parties made to review and adjust a solution or decision over time in light of changing conditions? (1) - What mechanisms beyond simple allocation can be incorporated into transboundary water agreements to add value and facilitate resolution? (3) - What role(s) can hydropower play in a nation's energy strategy? (1)

Showing below up to 11 results in range #1 to #11.

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)