Browse by Attribute

Case Study > Land Use: urban- high density

Click on one or more items below to narrow your results.

Natural, Societal & Political Domain Variables:

- Assets (9) - Ecosystems (7) - Governance (12) - Values and Norms (7) - Water Quality (9) - Water Quantity (11)

Climate:

- Arid/desert (Köppen B-type) (6) - Continental (Köppen D-type) (9) - Dry-summer (4) - Dry-winter (2) - Humid mid-latitude (Köppen C-type) (7) - Moist (5) - Moist tropical (Köppen A-type) (5) - Monsoon (6) - Semi-arid/steppe (Köppen B-type) (5) - alpine (3) - cold-climate (permafrost, tundra, polar) (1) - temperate (3)

Land Use: (Click arrow to add another value)

- agricultural- confined livestock operations - agricultural- cropland and pasture - conservation lands - forest land - industrial use - mining operations - rangeland - religious/cultural sites - urban - urban- high density - Other - None

Water Use:

- Agriculture or Irrigation (16) - Domestic/Urban Supply (17) - Fisheries - farmed (4) - Fisheries - wild (3) - Hydropower Generation (14) - Industry - consumptive use (7) - Industry - non-consumptive use (6) - Livestock (5) - Mining/Extraction support (1) - Other Ecological Services (5) - Recreation or Tourism (5)

Stakeholder Type:

- Community or organized citizens (8) - Cultural Interest (1) - Development/humanitarian interest (5) - Environmental interest (7) - Federated state/territorial/provincial government (5) - Industry/Corporate Interest (8) - Local Government (7) - Non-legislative governmental agency (7) - Sovereign state/national/federal government (9) - Supranational union (3)

Key Question:

- How can consultation and cooperation among stakeholders and development partners be better facilitated/managed/fostered? (1) - How can government be dis/incentivized to offer an inclusive planning process? (1) - How do issues of equity and development impact the identification of stakeholders in cases involving hydropower or other revenue generating water infrastructure? (2) - How does asymmetry of power influence water negotiations and how can the negative effects be mitigated? (4) - To what extent can international actors and movements from civil society influence water management? How and when is this beneficial/detrimental and how can these effects be supported/mitigated? (3) - What approaches are most beneficial for rapidly growing cities in the developing world to link water management to sustainable urban growth strategy? (1) - What calculations and considerations should be investigated by countries looking to harness additional hydropower? Which potential outcomes should be investigated or identified? (1) - What considerations can be given to incorporating collaborative adaptive management (CAM)? What efforts have the parties made to review and adjust a solution or decision over time in light of changing conditions? (2) - What kinds of water treaties or agreements between countries can provide sufficient structure and stability to ensure enforceability but also be flexible and adaptable given future uncertainties? (1) - What mechanisms beyond simple allocation can be incorporated into transboundary water agreements to add value and facilitate resolution? (4)

Showing below up to 18 results in range #1 to #18.

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)