Browse by Attribute

Case Study > Land Use : mining operations or urban- high density

Click on one or more items below to narrow your results.

Natural, Societal & Political Domain Variables:

- Assets (13) - Ecosystems (11) - Governance (16) - Values and Norms (10) - Water Quality (14) - Water Quantity (12)

Climate:

- Arid/desert (Köppen B-type) (8) - Continental (Köppen D-type) (10) - Dry-summer (5) - Dry-winter (3) - Humid mid-latitude (Köppen C-type) (8) - Moist (6) - Moist tropical (Köppen A-type) (7) - Monsoon (7) - Semi-arid/steppe (Köppen B-type) (7) - alpine (4) - cold-climate (permafrost, tundra, polar) (2) - temperate (5)

Land Use: (Click arrow to add another value)

- agricultural- confined livestock operations - agricultural- cropland and pasture - conservation lands - forest land - industrial use - mining operations - rangeland - religious/cultural sites - urban - urban- high density - Other - None

Water Use:

- Agriculture or Irrigation (21) - Domestic/Urban Supply (21) - Fisheries - farmed (4) - Fisheries - wild (7) - Hydropower Generation (14) - Industry - consumptive use (8) - Industry - non-consumptive use (8) - Livestock (5) - Mining/Extraction support (6) - Other Ecological Services (7) - Recreation or Tourism (5)

Stakeholder Type:

- Community or organized citizens (12) - Cultural Interest (2) - Development/humanitarian interest (6) - Environmental interest (11) - Federated state/territorial/provincial government (7) - Industry/Corporate Interest (13) - Local Government (8) - Non-legislative governmental agency (12) - Sovereign state/national/federal government (16) - Supranational union (5)

Key Question:

- How can consultation and cooperation among stakeholders and development partners be better facilitated/managed/fostered? (1) - How can costs for water quality projects be distributed between polluters and beneficiaries? (1) - How can government be dis/incentivized to offer an inclusive planning process? (1) - How can increasing urban water demand be balanced between the needs of the urban population and industry? (1) - How can mutual trust amongst riparians be nurtured? What actions erode that trust? (1) - How do issues of equity and development impact the identification of stakeholders in cases involving hydropower or other revenue generating water infrastructure? (2) - How does asymmetry of power influence water negotiations and how can the negative effects be mitigated? (5) - To what extent can international actors and movements from civil society influence water management? How and when is this beneficial/detrimental and how can these effects be supported/mitigated? (5) - What approaches are most beneficial for rapidly growing cities in the developing world to link water management to sustainable urban growth strategy? (1) - What calculations and considerations should be investigated by countries looking to harness additional hydropower? Which potential outcomes should be investigated or identified? (1) - What considerations can be given to incorporating collaborative adaptive management (CAM)? What efforts have the parties made to review and adjust a solution or decision over time in light of changing conditions? (4) - What kinds of water treaties or agreements between countries can provide sufficient structure and stability to ensure enforceability but also be flexible and adaptable given future uncertainties? (2) - What mechanisms beyond simple allocation can be incorporated into transboundary water agreements to add value and facilitate resolution? (5)

Showing below up to 25 results in range #1 to #25.

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)