Browse by Attribute
Choose a category:
- ASI (43)
- Article (772)
- Case Study (75)
- Key Question (28)
Case Study > Natural, Societal & Political Domain Variables:
Water Quantity
& Land Use :
industrial use or
religious/cultural sites
Click on one or more items below to narrow your results.
- Agriculture or Irrigation (16)
- Domestic/Urban Supply (13)
- Fisheries - farmed (2)
- Fisheries - wild (4)
- Hydropower Generation (13)
- Industry - consumptive use (4)
- Industry - non-consumptive use (6)
- Livestock (3)
- Mining/Extraction support (1)
- Other Ecological Services (5)
- Recreation or Tourism (3)
- Community or organized citizens (15)
- Cultural Interest (3)
- Development/humanitarian interest (6)
- Environmental interest (11)
- Federated state/territorial/provincial government (10)
- Industry/Corporate Interest (13)
- Local Government (10)
- Non-legislative governmental agency (14)
- Sovereign state/national/federal government (15)
- Supranational union (3)
- How can consultation and cooperation among stakeholders and development partners be better facilitated/managed/fostered? (4)
- How can costs for water quality projects be distributed between polluters and beneficiaries? (1)
- How can government be dis/incentivized to offer an inclusive planning process? (2)
- How do issues of equity and development impact the identification of stakeholders in cases involving hydropower or other revenue generating water infrastructure? (3)
- How do national policies influence water use at the local level? (2)
- How does asymmetry of power influence water negotiations and how can the negative effects be mitigated? (5)
- To what extent can international actors and movements from civil society influence water management? How and when is this beneficial/detrimental and how can these effects be supported/mitigated? (4)
- What approaches are most beneficial for rapidly growing cities in the developing world to link water management to sustainable urban growth strategy? (1)
- What calculations and considerations should be investigated by countries looking to harness additional hydropower? Which potential outcomes should be investigated or identified? (1)
- What considerations can be given to incorporating collaborative adaptive management (CAM)? What efforts have the parties made to review and adjust a solution or decision over time in light of changing conditions? (3)
- What kinds of water treaties or agreements between countries can provide sufficient structure and stability to ensure enforceability but also be flexible and adaptable given future uncertainties? (2)
- What mechanisms beyond simple allocation can be incorporated into transboundary water agreements to add value and facilitate resolution? (6)
- Where does the benefit “flow” from a hydropower project and how does that affect implementation and sustainability of the project? (1)
Showing below up to 18 results in range #1 to #18.
View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
A
C
- Case Study of Transboundary Dispute Resolution: Multilateral Working Group on Water Resources (Middle East)
- Case Study of Transboundary Dispute Resolution: the Tigris-Euphrates Basin
- Conflict Management Strategies Among Riparians Within the Indus River Basin
D
E
F
I
- Ilisu Dam Project, Turkey
- Integrated Management and Diplomacy Development of the Chao Phraya River Basin
- Integrated Management and Negotiations for Equitable Allocation of Flow of the Jordan River Among Riparian States
- International Joint Development of The La Plata River Basin
N
N cont.
R
- Regular Complexities: Lebanon's Water Issues
- River Basin Management and Environment Protection through a Conservation Trust Fund in Quito, Ecuador
T
U
W