Browse by Attribute

Case Study > Climate : Continental (Köppen D-type) or Semi-arid/steppe (Köppen B-type)

Click on one or more items below to narrow your results.

Natural, Societal & Political Domain Variables:

- Assets (17) - Ecosystems (14) - Governance (28) - Values and Norms (11) - Water Quality (24) - Water Quantity (25)

Climate: (Click arrow to add another value)

- Arid/desert (Köppen B-type) - Continental (Köppen D-type) - Dry-summer - Dry-winter - Humid mid-latitude (Köppen C-type) - Moist - Moist tropical (Köppen A-type) - Monsoon - Semi-arid/steppe (Köppen B-type) - alpine - cold-climate (permafrost, tundra, polar) - temperate - Other - None

Land Use:

- agricultural- confined livestock operations (4) - agricultural- cropland and pasture (32) - conservation lands (11) - forest land (10) - industrial use (14) - mining operations (3) - rangeland (12) - religious/cultural sites (12) - urban (16) - urban- high density (12)

Water Use:

- Agriculture or Irrigation (30) - Domestic/Urban Supply (29) - Fisheries - farmed (4) - Fisheries - wild (6) - Hydropower Generation (19) - Industry - consumptive use (9) - Industry - non-consumptive use (5) - Livestock (9) - Mining/Extraction support (3) - Other Ecological Services (9) - Recreation or Tourism (11)

Stakeholder Type:

- Community or organized citizens (22) - Cultural Interest (6) - Development/humanitarian interest (7) - Environmental interest (16) - Federated state/territorial/provincial government (15) - Industry/Corporate Interest (14) - Local Government (19) - Non-legislative governmental agency (19) - Sovereign state/national/federal government (27) - Supranational union (4)

Key Question:

- How can consultation and cooperation among stakeholders and development partners be better facilitated/managed/fostered? (5) - How can costs for water quality projects be distributed between polluters and beneficiaries? (1) - How can government be dis/incentivized to offer an inclusive planning process? (3) - How can increasing urban water demand be balanced between the needs of the urban population and industry? (1) - How can mutual trust amongst riparians be nurtured? What actions erode that trust? (2) - How do issues of equity and development impact the identification of stakeholders in cases involving hydropower or other revenue generating water infrastructure? (2) - How does asymmetry of power influence water negotiations and how can the negative effects be mitigated? (6) - To what extent can international actors and movements from civil society influence water management? How and when is this beneficial/detrimental and how can these effects be supported/mitigated? (7) - What approaches are most beneficial for rapidly growing cities in the developing world to link water management to sustainable urban growth strategy? (1) - What calculations and considerations should be investigated by countries looking to harness additional hydropower? Which potential outcomes should be investigated or identified? (1) - What considerations can be given to incorporating collaborative adaptive management (CAM)? What efforts have the parties made to review and adjust a solution or decision over time in light of changing conditions? (3) - What effective mechanisms can downstream states/countries use to protect their water related interests/rights? (1) - What kinds of water treaties or agreements between countries can provide sufficient structure and stability to ensure enforceability but also be flexible and adaptable given future uncertainties? (3) - What mechanisms beyond simple allocation can be incorporated into transboundary water agreements to add value and facilitate resolution? (11) - Where does the benefit “flow” from a hydropower project and how does that affect implementation and sustainability of the project? (2)

Showing below up to 36 results in range #1 to #36.

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)