Browse by Attribute

Case Study > Climate: Dry-summer & Land Use : conservation lands or rangeland

Click on one or more items below to narrow your results.

Natural, Societal & Political Domain Variables:

- Assets (6) - Ecosystems (5) - Governance (10) - Values and Norms (3) - Water Quality (8) - Water Quantity (9)

Climate: (Click arrow to add another value)

- Arid/desert (Köppen B-type) - Continental (Köppen D-type) - Dry-summer - Dry-winter - Humid mid-latitude (Köppen C-type) - Moist - Moist tropical (Köppen A-type) - Monsoon - Semi-arid/steppe (Köppen B-type) - alpine - cold-climate (permafrost, tundra, polar) - temperate - Other - None

Land Use: (Click arrow to add another value)

- agricultural- confined livestock operations - agricultural- cropland and pasture - conservation lands - forest land - industrial use - mining operations - rangeland - religious/cultural sites - urban - urban- high density - Other - None

Water Use:

- Agriculture or Irrigation (11) - Domestic/Urban Supply (10) - Fisheries - farmed (1) - Fisheries - wild (1) - Hydropower Generation (5) - Industry - consumptive use (4) - Industry - non-consumptive use (3) - Livestock (2) - Mining/Extraction support (1) - Other Ecological Services (4) - Recreation or Tourism (4)

Stakeholder Type:

- Community or organized citizens (7) - Cultural Interest (3) - Development/humanitarian interest (2) - Environmental interest (7) - Federated state/territorial/provincial government (2) - Industry/Corporate Interest (6) - Local Government (7) - Non-legislative governmental agency (6) - Sovereign state/national/federal government (8) - Supranational union (3)

Key Question:

- How can consultation and cooperation among stakeholders and development partners be better facilitated/managed/fostered? (3) - How can costs for water quality projects be distributed between polluters and beneficiaries? (1) - How can increasing urban water demand be balanced between the needs of the urban population and industry? (1) - How does asymmetry of power influence water negotiations and how can the negative effects be mitigated? (1) - What considerations can be given to incorporating collaborative adaptive management (CAM)? What efforts have the parties made to review and adjust a solution or decision over time in light of changing conditions? (1) - What effective mechanisms can downstream states/countries use to protect their water related interests/rights? (1) - What mechanisms beyond simple allocation can be incorporated into transboundary water agreements to add value and facilitate resolution? (4) - Where does the benefit “flow” from a hydropower project and how does that affect implementation and sustainability of the project? (1)

Showing below up to 11 results in range #1 to #11.

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)