Browse by Attribute
Choose a category:
- ASI (43)
- Article (772)
- Case Study (75)
- Key Question (28)
Case Study > Climate :
Semi-arid/steppe (Köppen B-type) or
temperate
& Land Use :
conservation lands or
industrial use or
rangeland
Click on one or more items below to narrow your results.
- Agriculture or Irrigation (24)
- Domestic/Urban Supply (22)
- Fisheries - farmed (1)
- Fisheries - wild (4)
- Hydropower Generation (14)
- Industry - consumptive use (7)
- Industry - non-consumptive use (6)
- Livestock (6)
- Mining/Extraction support (3)
- Other Ecological Services (6)
- Recreation or Tourism (6)
- Community or organized citizens (14)
- Cultural Interest (6)
- Development/humanitarian interest (6)
- Environmental interest (12)
- Federated state/territorial/provincial government (9)
- Industry/Corporate Interest (11)
- Local Government (11)
- Non-legislative governmental agency (14)
- Sovereign state/national/federal government (20)
- Supranational union (3)
- How can consultation and cooperation among stakeholders and development partners be better facilitated/managed/fostered? (4)
- How can costs for water quality projects be distributed between polluters and beneficiaries? (2)
- How can government be dis/incentivized to offer an inclusive planning process? (1)
- How can increasing urban water demand be balanced between the needs of the urban population and industry? (1)
- How do issues of equity and development impact the identification of stakeholders in cases involving hydropower or other revenue generating water infrastructure? (1)
- How does asymmetry of power influence water negotiations and how can the negative effects be mitigated? (5)
- To what extent can international actors and movements from civil society influence water management? How and when is this beneficial/detrimental and how can these effects be supported/mitigated? (5)
- What considerations can be given to incorporating collaborative adaptive management (CAM)? What efforts have the parties made to review and adjust a solution or decision over time in light of changing conditions? (1)
- What effective mechanisms can downstream states/countries use to protect their water related interests/rights? (1)
- What kinds of water treaties or agreements between countries can provide sufficient structure and stability to ensure enforceability but also be flexible and adaptable given future uncertainties? (1)
- What mechanisms beyond simple allocation can be incorporated into transboundary water agreements to add value and facilitate resolution? (10)
- Where does the benefit “flow” from a hydropower project and how does that affect implementation and sustainability of the project? (2)
Showing below up to 26 results in range #1 to #26.
View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
A
C
- Case Study of Transboundary Dispute Resolution: Multilateral Working Group on Water Resources (Middle East)
- Case Study of Transboundary Dispute Resolution: the Tigris-Euphrates Basin
- Conflict Management Strategies Among Riparians Within the Indus River Basin
- Conflicts over development in India's Narmada River Basin
E
I
L
M
- Management, Protection, and Control of Lake Titicaca
- Multilateral Negotiations over the Scheldt River Estuary: Transforming Centuries of Deadlock into Productive Multiparty Negotiations?
O
P
R
T
T cont.
- The Pecos River Compact and Texas - New Mexico Dispute
- The Role of the Red Sea-Dead Sea Water Conveyance Project for Regional Cooperation in the Jordan River Basin
- Transboundary Dispute Resolution: U.S./Mexico Shared Aquifers
U
W