Browse by Attribute

Case Study > Key Question: What mechanisms beyond simple allocation can be incorporated into transboundary water agreements to add value and facilitate resolution?

Click on one or more items below to narrow your results.

Natural, Societal & Political Domain Variables:

- Assets (13) - Ecosystems (7) - Governance (18) - Values and Norms (7) - Water Quality (12) - Water Quantity (14)

Climate:

- Arid/desert (Köppen B-type) (9) - Continental (Köppen D-type) (7) - Dry-summer (5) - Dry-winter (6) - Humid mid-latitude (Köppen C-type) (4) - Moist (5) - Moist tropical (Köppen A-type) (6) - Monsoon (5) - Semi-arid/steppe (Köppen B-type) (8) - alpine (3) - temperate (3)

Land Use:

- agricultural- confined livestock operations (1) - agricultural- cropland and pasture (17) - conservation lands (5) - forest land (8) - industrial use (10) - mining operations (1) - rangeland (8) - religious/cultural sites (7) - urban (8) - urban- high density (4)

Water Use:

- Agriculture or Irrigation (18) - Domestic/Urban Supply (17) - Fisheries - farmed (1) - Fisheries - wild (3) - Hydropower Generation (13) - Industry - consumptive use (3) - Other Ecological Services (5) - Recreation or Tourism (4)

Stakeholder Type:

- Community or organized citizens (11) - Cultural Interest (3) - Development/humanitarian interest (5) - Environmental interest (12) - Federated state/territorial/provincial government (8) - Industry/Corporate Interest (8) - Local Government (8) - Non-legislative governmental agency (16) - Sovereign state/national/federal government (17) - Supranational union (3)

Key Question: (Click arrow to add another value)

- Other - None

Showing below up to 20 results in range #1 to #20.

View (previous 50 | next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

View (previous 50 | next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)