Edit Riparian: Latvia

Jump to: navigation, search

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons:

  • The action you have requested is limited to users in one of the groups: Users, Administrators / Sysops, Volunteer Administrators, confirmed-user.
  • The action you have requested is limited to users in one of the groups: confirmed-user, editors, Administrators / Sysops, Volunteer Administrators.

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons:

  • The action you have requested is limited to users in one of the groups: Users, Administrators / Sysops, Volunteer Administrators, confirmed-user.
  • The action you have requested is limited to users in one of the groups: confirmed-user, editors, Administrators / Sysops, Volunteer Administrators.

[edit]

Geography Within which world region is this riparian located?

Administrative Hierarchy Select the best descriptors for describing Latvia. Most riparians are countries or major administrative units within countries, but occasionally minor administrative units are important players in a water management challenge or conflict.

Latvia is a country - a sovereign state.

Latvia is a major administrative unit within a country such as a province/state/territory/region.

Which sovereign state (country) is Latvia located in?

Latvia is a sub-unit within a country such as a city/town/county/district/parish, but is still very important to a case study.

Which sovereign state (country) is Latvia located in?

Which sub unit of this country is Latvia located in?

Population: (enter without any spaces or symbols, e.g.: 400000, 37298640, etc )


Image Upload - open the image upload page in a new tab:
Upload a File View all Files
You can find or upload a file and then return here.

To insert an image in your text, type: [[File:filename.jpg]]

Enter Any information about the Riparian here. Focus your discussion on water related topics for this Riparian. Use the file upload tool to add images or documents.

You can link this article to related background articles. This builds strong connections between the elements of a case. Also, individual riparians, natural features, projects and initiatives, or agreements do not need to be explained in great detail in the body of every case, reducing redundancy.

If an article exists, you can enter the title (e.g.: Ganges River, Mekong River Commission, Glen Canyon Dam, Indus Water Treaty), and it will be automatically linked to the case study. If the article does not exist, a new page will automatically be created for the feature. You will be able to see/edit that page by clicking the link when viewing your saved case study.

We suggest looking at the existing list of riparians, features, projects, and agreements.

Which water sources (lakes, rivers, aquifers, etc) are located in or flow through Latvia and are important for commerce, ecology, irrigation, industry, and domestic use ?
Rivers, Lakes, Aquifers, and other Major Water Resources in this riparian

Which water projects (such as dams or desalination) and initiatives (such as commissions or programs) are important to Latvia?:
Water Projects

Which agreements or treaties involve or mention Latvia?
Agreement or Treaty

The contributing author, other editors, and admins can all provide public case review. Checking any of the boxes below will place a notice at the beginning of the case

To enhance the ability of a contributor to improve a case, please answer the yes/no questions below. For each "yes" (checked) answer, you should initiate a discussion on the case study discussion page to explain the improvements required.

The purpose of this review is to both encourage users to continually improve cases and also to alert readers that there are aspects of the case that could be improved. Any editor/contributor may remove an alert (by unchecking the related box) after the issue has been addressed.

Completeness

Are 1 or more sections empty?
does the case/page need more formatting or copyediting help?
Are 1 or more sections incomplete?
Does the case/page need additional or better references?
Does the case/page need more internal links (to AquaPedia Pages)?
Does this case/page need more external links (to relevant external sources)?

Content

Is content out of date? or, are there recent developments that should be addressed by the case?
Is there a dispute about the accuracy of the content?
Is there a need to represent additional points of view?



Cancel

Retrieved from "http://aquapedia.waterdiplomacy.org/wiki/index.php/Latvia"