Browse by Attribute

Case Study > Natural, Societal & Political Domain Variables: Assets & Water Use: Industry - consumptive use

Click on one or more items below to narrow your results.

Natural, Societal & Political Domain Variables: (Click arrow to add another value)

- Assets - Ecosystems - Governance - Values and Norms - Water Quality - Water Quantity - Other - None

Climate:

- Continental (Köppen D-type) (2) - Dry-summer (4) - Humid mid-latitude (Köppen C-type) (1) - Moist (1) - Moist tropical (Köppen A-type) (1) - Monsoon (1) - alpine (2) - temperate (2)

Land Use:

- agricultural- confined livestock operations (4) - agricultural- cropland and pasture (6) - conservation lands (3) - forest land (2) - industrial use (5) - rangeland (1) - religious/cultural sites (1) - urban (5) - urban- high density (3)

Water Use: (Click arrow to add another value)

- Agriculture or Irrigation - Domestic/Urban Supply - Fisheries - farmed - Fisheries - wild - Hydropower Generation - Industry - consumptive use - Industry - non-consumptive use - Livestock - Mining/Extraction support - Other Ecological Services - Recreation or Tourism - Other - None

Stakeholder Type:

- Community or organized citizens (6) - Cultural Interest (3) - Development/humanitarian interest (4) - Environmental interest (7) - Federated state/territorial/provincial government (6) - Industry/Corporate Interest (5) - Local Government (4) - Non-legislative governmental agency (4) - Sovereign state/national/federal government (5) - Supranational union (2)

Key Question:

- How can consultation and cooperation among stakeholders and development partners be better facilitated/managed/fostered? (2) - How can costs for water quality projects be distributed between polluters and beneficiaries? (1) - How can government be dis/incentivized to offer an inclusive planning process? (1) - How do issues of equity and development impact the identification of stakeholders in cases involving hydropower or other revenue generating water infrastructure? (1) - How does asymmetry of power influence water negotiations and how can the negative effects be mitigated? (1) - To what extent can international actors and movements from civil society influence water management? How and when is this beneficial/detrimental and how can these effects be supported/mitigated? (1) - What considerations can be given to incorporating collaborative adaptive management (CAM)? What efforts have the parties made to review and adjust a solution or decision over time in light of changing conditions? (1) - What mechanisms beyond simple allocation can be incorporated into transboundary water agreements to add value and facilitate resolution? (1) - What role(s) can hydropower play in a nation's energy strategy? (1)

Showing below up to 7 results in range #1 to #7.

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)