Browse by Attribute

Case Study > Land Use : rangeland or religious/cultural sites & Water Use: Other Ecological Services

Click on one or more items below to narrow your results.

Natural, Societal & Political Domain Variables:

- Assets (3) - Ecosystems (3) - Governance (5) - Values and Norms (3) - Water Quality (5) - Water Quantity (4)

Climate:

- Arid/desert (Köppen B-type) (4) - Continental (Köppen D-type) (2) - Dry-summer (3) - Dry-winter (2) - Humid mid-latitude (Köppen C-type) (1) - Moist (1) - Moist tropical (Köppen A-type) (2) - Monsoon (1) - Semi-arid/steppe (Köppen B-type) (5) - alpine (2) - cold-climate (permafrost, tundra, polar) (1) - temperate (2)

Land Use: (Click arrow to add another value)

- agricultural- confined livestock operations - agricultural- cropland and pasture - conservation lands - forest land - industrial use - mining operations - rangeland - religious/cultural sites - urban - urban- high density - Other - None

Water Use: (Click arrow to add another value)

- Agriculture or Irrigation - Domestic/Urban Supply - Fisheries - farmed - Fisheries - wild - Hydropower Generation - Industry - consumptive use - Industry - non-consumptive use - Livestock - Mining/Extraction support - Other Ecological Services - Recreation or Tourism - Other - None

Stakeholder Type:

- Community or organized citizens (3) - Cultural Interest (2) - Development/humanitarian interest (1) - Environmental interest (5) - Federated state/territorial/provincial government (3) - Industry/Corporate Interest (4) - Local Government (2) - Non-legislative governmental agency (4) - Sovereign state/national/federal government (6)

Key Question:

- How can consultation and cooperation among stakeholders and development partners be better facilitated/managed/fostered? (3) - How do issues of equity and development impact the identification of stakeholders in cases involving hydropower or other revenue generating water infrastructure? (1) - How do national policies influence water use at the local level? (1) - How does asymmetry of power influence water negotiations and how can the negative effects be mitigated? (1) - What considerations can be given to incorporating collaborative adaptive management (CAM)? What efforts have the parties made to review and adjust a solution or decision over time in light of changing conditions? (1) - What effective mechanisms can downstream states/countries use to protect their water related interests/rights? (1) - What mechanisms beyond simple allocation can be incorporated into transboundary water agreements to add value and facilitate resolution? (2) - What role(s) can hydropower play in a nation's energy strategy? (1)

Showing below up to 7 results in range #1 to #7.

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)