Browse by Attribute

Case Study > Climate : Moist tropical (Köppen A-type) or cold-climate (permafrost, tundra, polar) & Stakeholder Type: Development/humanitarian interest

Click on one or more items below to narrow your results.

Natural, Societal & Political Domain Variables:

- Assets (4) - Ecosystems (4) - Governance (6) - Values and Norms (2) - Water Quality (5) - Water Quantity (3)

Climate: (Click arrow to add another value)

- Arid/desert (Köppen B-type) - Continental (Köppen D-type) - Dry-summer - Dry-winter - Humid mid-latitude (Köppen C-type) - Moist - Moist tropical (Köppen A-type) - Monsoon - Semi-arid/steppe (Köppen B-type) - alpine - cold-climate (permafrost, tundra, polar) - temperate - Other - None

Land Use:

- agricultural- confined livestock operations (1) - agricultural- cropland and pasture (4) - conservation lands (2) - forest land (3) - industrial use (3) - mining operations (1) - rangeland (2) - religious/cultural sites (1) - urban (2) - urban- high density (1)

Water Use:

- Agriculture or Irrigation (4) - Domestic/Urban Supply (5) - Fisheries - farmed (1) - Fisheries - wild (2) - Hydropower Generation (3) - Industry - consumptive use (1) - Industry - non-consumptive use (2) - Livestock (1) - Mining/Extraction support (1) - Other Ecological Services (2) - Recreation or Tourism (1)

Stakeholder Type: (Click arrow to add another value)

- Community or organized citizens - Cultural Interest - Development/humanitarian interest - Environmental interest - Federated state/territorial/provincial government - Industry/Corporate Interest - Local Government - Non-legislative governmental agency - Sovereign state/national/federal government - Supranational union - Other - None

Key Question:

- How can consultation and cooperation among stakeholders and development partners be better facilitated/managed/fostered? (2) - How do issues of equity and development impact the identification of stakeholders in cases involving hydropower or other revenue generating water infrastructure? (2) - To what extent can international actors and movements from civil society influence water management? How and when is this beneficial/detrimental and how can these effects be supported/mitigated? (2) - What calculations and considerations should be investigated by countries looking to harness additional hydropower? Which potential outcomes should be investigated or identified? (1) - What considerations can be given to incorporating collaborative adaptive management (CAM)? What efforts have the parties made to review and adjust a solution or decision over time in light of changing conditions? (1) - What kinds of water treaties or agreements between countries can provide sufficient structure and stability to ensure enforceability but also be flexible and adaptable given future uncertainties? (1) - What mechanisms beyond simple allocation can be incorporated into transboundary water agreements to add value and facilitate resolution? (2) - What role(s) can hydropower play in a nation's energy strategy? (1) - Where does the benefit “flow” from a hydropower project and how does that affect implementation and sustainability of the project? (1)

Showing below up to 6 results in range #1 to #6.

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)