Browse by Attribute

Case Study > Natural, Societal & Political Domain Variables: Water Quality & Climate: Other & Land Use: rangeland

Click on one or more items below to narrow your results.

Natural, Societal & Political Domain Variables: (Click arrow to add another value)

- Assets - Ecosystems - Governance - Values and Norms - Water Quality - Water Quantity - Other - None

Climate: (Click arrow to add another value)

- Arid/desert (Köppen B-type) - Continental (Köppen D-type) - Dry-summer - Dry-winter - Humid mid-latitude (Köppen C-type) - Moist - Moist tropical (Köppen A-type) - Monsoon - Semi-arid/steppe (Köppen B-type) - alpine - cold-climate (permafrost, tundra, polar) - temperate - Other - None

Land Use: (Click arrow to add another value)

- agricultural- confined livestock operations - agricultural- cropland and pasture - conservation lands - forest land - industrial use - mining operations - rangeland - religious/cultural sites - urban - urban- high density - Other - None

Water Use:

- Agriculture or Irrigation (9) - Domestic/Urban Supply (9) - Fisheries - wild (2) - Hydropower Generation (3) - Industry - consumptive use (2) - Mining/Extraction support (1) - Other Ecological Services (3) - Recreation or Tourism (4)

Stakeholder Type:

- Community or organized citizens (7) - Cultural Interest (3) - Development/humanitarian interest (2) - Environmental interest (7) - Federated state/territorial/provincial government (3) - Industry/Corporate Interest (4) - Local Government (4) - Non-legislative governmental agency (5) - Sovereign state/national/federal government (10) - Supranational union (1)

Key Question:

- How can consultation and cooperation among stakeholders and development partners be better facilitated/managed/fostered? (2) - How can costs for water quality projects be distributed between polluters and beneficiaries? (1) - How can increasing urban water demand be balanced between the needs of the urban population and industry? (1) - How do issues of equity and development impact the identification of stakeholders in cases involving hydropower or other revenue generating water infrastructure? (1) - To what extent can international actors and movements from civil society influence water management? How and when is this beneficial/detrimental and how can these effects be supported/mitigated? (2) - What kinds of water treaties or agreements between countries can provide sufficient structure and stability to ensure enforceability but also be flexible and adaptable given future uncertainties? (1) - What mechanisms beyond simple allocation can be incorporated into transboundary water agreements to add value and facilitate resolution? (7) - What role(s) can hydropower play in a nation's energy strategy? (1)

Showing below up to 10 results in range #1 to #10.

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)