Browse by Attribute

Case Study > Natural, Societal & Political Domain Variables : Governance or Values and Norms & Climate: Monsoon

Click on one or more items below to narrow your results.

Natural, Societal & Political Domain Variables: (Click arrow to add another value)

- Assets - Ecosystems - Governance - Values and Norms - Water Quality - Water Quantity - Other - None

Climate: (Click arrow to add another value)

- Arid/desert (Köppen B-type) - Continental (Köppen D-type) - Dry-summer - Dry-winter - Humid mid-latitude (Köppen C-type) - Moist - Moist tropical (Köppen A-type) - Monsoon - Semi-arid/steppe (Köppen B-type) - alpine - cold-climate (permafrost, tundra, polar) - temperate - Other - None

Land Use:

- agricultural- confined livestock operations (1) - agricultural- cropland and pasture (11) - conservation lands (1) - forest land (5) - industrial use (7) - mining operations (1) - rangeland (3) - religious/cultural sites (2) - urban (4) - urban- high density (5)

Water Use:

- Agriculture or Irrigation (10) - Domestic/Urban Supply (9) - Fisheries - farmed (2) - Fisheries - wild (4) - Hydropower Generation (9) - Industry - consumptive use (1) - Industry - non-consumptive use (3) - Livestock (2) - Mining/Extraction support (1) - Other Ecological Services (1) - Recreation or Tourism (2)

Stakeholder Type:

- Community or organized citizens (8) - Development/humanitarian interest (6) - Environmental interest (5) - Federated state/territorial/provincial government (4) - Industry/Corporate Interest (5) - Local Government (9) - Non-legislative governmental agency (9) - Sovereign state/national/federal government (11) - Supranational union (2)

Key Question:

- How can consultation and cooperation among stakeholders and development partners be better facilitated/managed/fostered? (1) - How can government be dis/incentivized to offer an inclusive planning process? (1) - How can mutual trust amongst riparians be nurtured? What actions erode that trust? (1) - How do issues of equity and development impact the identification of stakeholders in cases involving hydropower or other revenue generating water infrastructure? (3) - How does asymmetry of power influence water negotiations and how can the negative effects be mitigated? (1) - To what extent can international actors and movements from civil society influence water management? How and when is this beneficial/detrimental and how can these effects be supported/mitigated? (5) - What calculations and considerations should be investigated by countries looking to harness additional hydropower? Which potential outcomes should be investigated or identified? (2) - What kinds of water treaties or agreements between countries can provide sufficient structure and stability to ensure enforceability but also be flexible and adaptable given future uncertainties? (3) - What mechanisms beyond simple allocation can be incorporated into transboundary water agreements to add value and facilitate resolution? (5) - What role(s) can hydropower play in a nation's energy strategy? (1) - Where does the benefit “flow” from a hydropower project and how does that affect implementation and sustainability of the project? (2)

Showing below up to 13 results in range #1 to #13.

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)