Difference between revisions of "The Pecos River Compact and Texas - New Mexico Dispute"
From AquaPedia Case Study Database
[unchecked revision] | [unchecked revision] |
(initial creation (Saved using "Save and continue" button in form)) |
(initial creation (Saved using "Save and continue" button in form)) |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|Area=115,000 | |Area=115,000 | ||
|Geolocation=32, -103.98 | |Geolocation=32, -103.98 | ||
− | |Issues= | + | |Issues={{Issue}} |
− | |Key Questions= | + | |Key Questions={{Key Question |
+ | |Subject=Transboundary Water Issues | ||
+ | |Key Question - Dams= | ||
+ | |Key Question - Urban= | ||
+ | |Key Question - Desalination= | ||
+ | |Key Question - Influence= | ||
+ | |Key Question - Industries= | ||
+ | }} | ||
|Water Feature= | |Water Feature= | ||
− | |Riparian= | + | |Riparian={{Link Riparian |
+ | |Riparian=New Mexico (U.S.) | ||
+ | }}{{Link Riparian | ||
+ | |Riparian=Texas (U.S.) | ||
+ | }} | ||
|Water Project= | |Water Project= | ||
|Agreement= | |Agreement= |
Revision as of 17:33, 29 April 2014
Case Description
Loading map...
Geolocation: | 32° 0' 0", -103° 58' 48" |
---|---|
Total Population | ~0.39390,000 millionmillion |
Total Area | 115,000115,000 km² 44,401.5 mi² km2 |
Climate Descriptors | Semi-arid/steppe (Köppen B-type) |
Predominent Land Use Descriptors | agricultural- cropland and pasture, conservation lands, rangeland |
Important Uses of Water | Agriculture or Irrigation, Domestic/Urban Supply, Hydropower Generation |
Riparians: | New Mexico (U.S.), Texas (U.S.) |
Contents
Summary
Natural, Historic, Economic, Regional, and Political Framework
Issues and Stakeholders
Analysis, Synthesis, and Insight
What is an ASI?
Individuals may add their own Analysis, Synthesis, and Insight (ASI) to a case. ASI sub-articles are protected, so that each contributor retains authorship and control of their own content. Edit the case to add your own ASI.
Learn moreASI:The Pecos River Compact - Good decisions can still lead to bad outcomes
The history of the Pecos River negotiations between Texas and New Mexico are full of contention and dissatisfaction. Yet, it is clear that they still took many important steps in the Water Diplomacy Framework. What went wrong and how can we learn from this case?(read the full article... )
Contributed by: Matt Fitzgerald (last edit: 14 May 2014)
Key Questions
Transboundary Water Issues:
no description entered