View source for Talk:Water Quality Control of the South-to-North Water Diversion (SNWD) Middle Route Project (MRP)

From AquaPedia Case Study Database
Jump to: navigation, search


This page is only for discussing the contents of the parent case or article: Water Quality Control of the South-to-North Water Diversion (SNWD) Middle Route Project (MRP)

Each article in AquaPedia has its own discussion page, which is for comments, questions, and discourse on the topics and content of the linked article. Please only post your comments where they are most relevant.

Only users who are logged in may comment. If you are not logged in, use the "Log In" link in the top right corner.


Click the "Start a new discussion" link below to begin a new discussion thread. You may also reply to any (existing) comments or topics. If you have trouble using the discussion extension, you can find information on how to use it here (external link).


Contents

Thread titleRepliesLast modified
Payment for Water Quality Services (PWQS)013:05, 7 June 2012
Issues/Stakeholders/Analysis110:48, 7 June 2012

Payment for Water Quality Services (PWQS)

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reason:

You are not allowed to execute the action you have requested.


You can view and copy the source of this page:

Return to Thread:Talk:Water Quality Control of the South-to-North Water Diversion (SNWD) Middle Route Project (MRP)/Payment for Water Quality Services (PWQS).

Issues/Stakeholders/Analysis

The issues discussed in the Issues section does not track 1-to-1 with the issues discussed in analysis. While I believe a strong case is made, I think the case would benefit from a greater sense of internal consistency.

Amanda10:47, 7 June 2012

by that, I'm referring to the fact that the issues don't match in the two sections.

Amanda10:48, 7 June 2012