Browse by Attribute

Case Study > Key Question : How can packages or options that link issues creatively or build on possible technology innovations be employed to create non-zero sum choices within negotiations that include water resources? or What considerations can be given to incorporating collaborative adaptive management (CAM)? What efforts have the parties made to review and adjust a solution or decision over time in light of changing conditions?

Click on one or more items below to narrow your results.

Natural, Societal & Political Domain Variables:

- Assets (5) - Ecosystems (6) - Governance (6) - Values and Norms (4) - Water Quality (6) - Water Quantity (5)

Climate:

- Arid/desert (Köppen B-type) (2) - Continental (Köppen D-type) (3) - Dry-summer (1) - Dry-winter (2) - alpine (2) - cold-climate (permafrost, tundra, polar) (2) - temperate (1)

Land Use:

- agricultural- confined livestock operations (1) - agricultural- cropland and pasture (4) - conservation lands (4) - industrial use (4) - mining operations (2) - religious/cultural sites (2) - urban (2) - urban- high density (2)

Water Use:

- Agriculture or Irrigation (6) - Domestic/Urban Supply (6) - Fisheries - farmed (2) - Fisheries - wild (4) - Hydropower Generation (5) - Industry - consumptive use (1) - Industry - non-consumptive use (4) - Livestock (1) - Mining/Extraction support (1) - Other Ecological Services (6) - Recreation or Tourism (2)

Stakeholder Type:

- Community or organized citizens (5) - Cultural Interest (1) - Development/humanitarian interest (2) - Environmental interest (5) - Federated state/territorial/provincial government (4) - Industry/Corporate Interest (6) - Local Government (3) - Non-legislative governmental agency (6) - Sovereign state/national/federal government (8) - Supranational union (4)

Key Question: (Click arrow to add another value)

- Other - None

Showing below up to 9 results in range #1 to #9.

View (previous 50 | next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

View (previous 50 | next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)