Browse by Attribute

Case Study > Land Use: rangeland

Click on one or more items below to narrow your results.

Natural, Societal & Political Domain Variables:

- Assets (7) - Ecosystems (4) - Governance (12) - Values and Norms (4) - Water Quality (10) - Water Quantity (11)

Climate:

- Arid/desert (Köppen B-type) (6) - Continental (Köppen D-type) (6) - Dry-summer (8) - Dry-winter (7) - Humid mid-latitude (Köppen C-type) (4) - Moist (3) - Moist tropical (Köppen A-type) (5) - Monsoon (4) - Semi-arid/steppe (Köppen B-type) (11) - alpine (2) - cold-climate (permafrost, tundra, polar) (1) - temperate (5)

Land Use: (Click arrow to add another value)

- agricultural- confined livestock operations - agricultural- cropland and pasture - conservation lands - forest land - industrial use - mining operations - rangeland - religious/cultural sites - urban - urban- high density - Other - None

Water Use:

- Agriculture or Irrigation (15) - Domestic/Urban Supply (11) - Fisheries - farmed (1) - Fisheries - wild (4) - Hydropower Generation (9) - Industry - consumptive use (3) - Industry - non-consumptive use (1) - Livestock (3) - Mining/Extraction support (2) - Other Ecological Services (5) - Recreation or Tourism (6)

Stakeholder Type:

- Community or organized citizens (9) - Cultural Interest (4) - Development/humanitarian interest (2) - Environmental interest (7) - Federated state/territorial/provincial government (4) - Industry/Corporate Interest (6) - Local Government (7) - Non-legislative governmental agency (7) - Sovereign state/national/federal government (14) - Supranational union (1)

Key Question:

- How can consultation and cooperation among stakeholders and development partners be better facilitated/managed/fostered? (3) - How can costs for water quality projects be distributed between polluters and beneficiaries? (1) - How can increasing urban water demand be balanced between the needs of the urban population and industry? (1) - How can mutual trust amongst riparians be nurtured? What actions erode that trust? (1) - How do issues of equity and development impact the identification of stakeholders in cases involving hydropower or other revenue generating water infrastructure? (1) - How does asymmetry of power influence water negotiations and how can the negative effects be mitigated? (1) - To what extent can international actors and movements from civil society influence water management? How and when is this beneficial/detrimental and how can these effects be supported/mitigated? (3) - What effective mechanisms can downstream states/countries use to protect their water related interests/rights? (2) - What kinds of water treaties or agreements between countries can provide sufficient structure and stability to ensure enforceability but also be flexible and adaptable given future uncertainties? (2) - What mechanisms beyond simple allocation can be incorporated into transboundary water agreements to add value and facilitate resolution? (8) - What role(s) can hydropower play in a nation's energy strategy? (1) - Where does the benefit “flow” from a hydropower project and how does that affect implementation and sustainability of the project? (2)

Showing below up to 16 results in range #1 to #16.

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)