Browse by Attribute

Case Study > Climate: Semi-arid/steppe (Köppen B-type)

Click on one or more items below to narrow your results.

Natural, Societal & Political Domain Variables:

- Assets (11) - Ecosystems (9) - Governance (19) - Values and Norms (8) - Water Quality (17) - Water Quantity (17)

Climate: (Click arrow to add another value)

- Arid/desert (Köppen B-type) - Continental (Köppen D-type) - Dry-summer - Dry-winter - Humid mid-latitude (Köppen C-type) - Moist - Moist tropical (Köppen A-type) - Monsoon - Semi-arid/steppe (Köppen B-type) - alpine - cold-climate (permafrost, tundra, polar) - temperate - Other - None

Land Use:

- agricultural- confined livestock operations (1) - agricultural- cropland and pasture (22) - conservation lands (8) - forest land (8) - industrial use (9) - mining operations (3) - rangeland (11) - religious/cultural sites (10) - urban (10) - urban- high density (5)

Water Use:

- Agriculture or Irrigation (23) - Domestic/Urban Supply (19) - Fisheries - farmed (2) - Fisheries - wild (3) - Hydropower Generation (12) - Industry - consumptive use (5) - Industry - non-consumptive use (2) - Livestock (7) - Mining/Extraction support (3) - Other Ecological Services (5) - Recreation or Tourism (6)

Stakeholder Type:

- Community or organized citizens (14) - Cultural Interest (5) - Development/humanitarian interest (5) - Environmental interest (12) - Federated state/territorial/provincial government (10) - Industry/Corporate Interest (10) - Local Government (13) - Non-legislative governmental agency (13) - Sovereign state/national/federal government (18) - Supranational union (2)

Key Question:

- How can consultation and cooperation among stakeholders and development partners be better facilitated/managed/fostered? (4) - How can costs for water quality projects be distributed between polluters and beneficiaries? (1) - How can government be dis/incentivized to offer an inclusive planning process? (1) - How can increasing urban water demand be balanced between the needs of the urban population and industry? (1) - How can mutual trust amongst riparians be nurtured? What actions erode that trust? (1) - How do issues of equity and development impact the identification of stakeholders in cases involving hydropower or other revenue generating water infrastructure? (1) - How does asymmetry of power influence water negotiations and how can the negative effects be mitigated? (5) - To what extent can international actors and movements from civil society influence water management? How and when is this beneficial/detrimental and how can these effects be supported/mitigated? (4) - What effective mechanisms can downstream states/countries use to protect their water related interests/rights? (1) - What kinds of water treaties or agreements between countries can provide sufficient structure and stability to ensure enforceability but also be flexible and adaptable given future uncertainties? (1) - What mechanisms beyond simple allocation can be incorporated into transboundary water agreements to add value and facilitate resolution? (8) - Where does the benefit “flow” from a hydropower project and how does that affect implementation and sustainability of the project? (1)

Showing below up to 24 results in range #1 to #24.

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)