Browse wiki

Jump to: navigation, search
Integrated Management and Negotiations for Equitable Allocation of Flow of the Jordan River Among Riparian States
Answer Including key non-riparian parties can be Including key non-riparian parties can be useful to reaching agreement; excluding them can be harmful. Egypt was included in the Johnston plan era negotiations because of its preeminence in the Arab world, and despite its non-riparian status. Some attribute the accomplishments made during the course in part to President Nasser's support. In contrast, pressure after the negotiations from other Arab states not directly involved in the water conflict may have had an impact on its eventual demise. Iraq and Saudi Arabia strongly urged Lebanon, Syria and Jordan not to accept the Plan. Perhaps partially as a result, Lebanon said they would not enter any agreement that split the waters of the Hasbani River or any other river. Along with political entities, many interests affected by river management were not included in the process. These included NGO's, public interest groups, and environmental groups. Perhaps as a consequence, the entire river was allocated, without consideration of in-stream usage. without consideration of in-stream usage.  +
Case Study Integrated Management and Negotiations for Equitable Allocation of Flow of the Jordan River Among Riparian States  +
KQandA Integrated Management and Negotiations for Equitable Allocation of Flow of the Jordan River Among Riparian States  +
Question To what extent can international actors and movements from civil society influence water management? How and when is this beneficial/detrimental and how can these effects be supported/mitigated?  +
hide properties that link here 
Integrated Management and Negotiations for Equitable Allocation of Flow of the Jordan River Among Riparian States + Has subobjectThis property is a special property in this wiki.
 

 

Enter the name of the page to start browsing from.