Difference between revisions of "Pollution in the Pilcomayo: Mining and Indigenous Communities"
| [unchecked revision] | [unchecked revision] |
m (Saved using "Save and continue" button in form) |
m (Saved using "Save and continue" button in form) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
|Stakeholder Type=Sovereign state/national/federal government, Industry/Corporate Interest, Community or organized citizens | |Stakeholder Type=Sovereign state/national/federal government, Industry/Corporate Interest, Community or organized citizens | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | |Key Questions= | + | |Key Questions={{Key Question |
| + | |Subject=Power and Politics | ||
| + | |Key Question - Influence=To what extent can international actors and movements from civil society influence water management? How and when is this beneficial/detrimental and how can these effects be supported/mitigated? | ||
| + | |Key Question Description=Several important donors have been active in the Pilcomayo Basin. Also, there are budding initiatives by indigenous groups to organize. The question is, to what extent these forces from above and below are effective in asserting tighter control over pollution. | ||
| + | }} | ||
|Water Feature= | |Water Feature= | ||
|Riparian= | |Riparian= | ||
Revision as of 18:09, 25 May 2017
| Geolocation: | -22° 2' 17.2448", -62° 41' 0.9365" |
|---|---|
| Total Population | 290290,000,000 millionmillion |
| Climate Descriptors | Humid mid-latitude (Köppen C-type) |
| Predominent Land Use Descriptors | agricultural- cropland and pasture, conservation lands, mining operations, rangeland, religious/cultural sites |
| Important Uses of Water | Agriculture or Irrigation, Fisheries - wild, Mining/Extraction support, Recreation or Tourism |
Contents
Summary
The Pilcomayo River is experiencing considerable pollution from mining activities in Bolivia, affecting the downstream riparians Argentina and Paraguay. The pollution is problematic in particular for indigenous communities who live from the river, and studies have found symptoms of heavy metal exposure among them. Even though the three countries have an exemplary framework for joint basin management, the pollution issue has so far not been addressed. The key reason is that indigenous communities are not represented by their national governments, shifting the conflict to the domestic level. Broader stakeholder participation could be an effective measure to bring the conflict to the table and developing the tourism industry in Bolivia could help to resolve it.
Natural, Historic, Economic, Regional, and Political Framework
Issues and Stakeholders
Pollution
NSPD: Water Quality
Stakeholder Types: Sovereign state/national/federal government, Industry/Corporate Interest, Community or organized citizens
Analysis, Synthesis, and Insight
Individuals may add their own Analysis, Synthesis, and Insight (ASI) to a case. ASI sub-articles are protected, so that each contributor retains authorship and control of their own content. Edit the case to add your own ASI.
Learn moreNo ASI articles have been added yet for this case
Key Questions
Several important donors have been active in the Pilcomayo Basin. Also, there are budding initiatives by indigenous groups to organize. The question is, to what extent these forces from above and below are effective in asserting tighter control over pollution.
Tagged with: tailings stakeholder participation indigeneous populations
