Difference between revisions of "Form:Case Study"
From AquaPedia Case Study Database
| Line 249: | Line 249: | ||
{{{field|Key Question - Urban|property=Key Question|input type=radiobutton|values=What approaches are most beneficial for rapidly growing cities in the developing world to link water management to sustainable urban growth strategy?, How can increasing urban water demand be balanced between the needs of the urban population and industry?, How can costs for water quality projects be distributed between polluters and beneficiaries?}}} | {{{field|Key Question - Urban|property=Key Question|input type=radiobutton|values=What approaches are most beneficial for rapidly growing cities in the developing world to link water management to sustainable urban growth strategy?, How can increasing urban water demand be balanced between the needs of the urban population and industry?, How can costs for water quality projects be distributed between polluters and beneficiaries?}}} | ||
</div><div id="Transboundary" class="Questions"> | </div><div id="Transboundary" class="Questions"> | ||
| − | {{{field|Key Question - Transboundary|property=Key Question|input type=radiobutton|values=What kinds of water treaties or agreements between countries can provide sufficient structure and stability to ensure enforceability but also be flexible and adaptable given future uncertainties?, What mechanisms beyond simple allocation can be incorporated into transboundary water agreements to add value and facilitate resolution?, What considerations can be given to incorporating collaborative adaptive management (CAM)? What efforts have the parties made to review and adjust a solution or decision over time in light of changing conditions?, How can packages or options that link issues creatively or build on possible technology innovations be employed to create non-zero sum choices within negotiations that include water resources? | + | {{{field|Key Question - Transboundary|property=Key Question|input type=radiobutton|values=What kinds of water treaties or agreements between countries can provide sufficient structure and stability to ensure enforceability but also be flexible and adaptable given future uncertainties?, What mechanisms beyond simple allocation can be incorporated into transboundary water agreements to add value and facilitate resolution?, What considerations can be given to incorporating collaborative adaptive management (CAM)? What efforts have the parties made to review and adjust a solution or decision over time in light of changing conditions?, How can packages or options that link issues creatively or build on possible technology innovations be employed to create non-zero sum choices within negotiations that include water resources?, How can mutual trust amongst riparians be nurtured? What actions erode that trust? |
}}} | }}} | ||
</div><div id="Innovation" class="Questions"> | </div><div id="Innovation" class="Questions"> | ||
Revision as of 10:17, 22 January 2015
Add the title for your case study. Please choose a descriptive title that captures the setting and purpose for your case:
Example Titles:
- Water Quality Control of the South-to-North Water Diversion (SNWD) Middle Route Project (MRP), China
- Hydropower development in the Nam Ngum River Basin
- Can Agricultural Policy Help Save Water and Money in the Apalachicola-Chattahoochee-Flint River Basin?
If there is an existing case study with the same title, you will be sent to a page for editing the existing case. You may want to check the list of case studies to see if there are opportunities to add to an existing case, rather than create a new one.
