Difference between revisions of "Form:Case Study"

From AquaPedia Case Study Database
Jump to: navigation, search
(Undo revision 2809 by Administrator (talk))
Line 46: Line 46:
 
|}
 
|}
  
==Linked Sections==
+
=Linked Sections=
 
These are self-contained pages containing factual information useful in a variety of case studies.  List the pre-existing sections relevant to your study, or add your own.
 
These are self-contained pages containing factual information useful in a variety of case studies.  List the pre-existing sections relevant to your study, or add your own.
 
{| class="formtable"
 
{| class="formtable"
Line 89: Line 89:
 
=Summary=
 
=Summary=
  
'''Abstract: (suggested format) '''
+
'''Summary: (suggested format) '''
  
 
1) One sentence clearly stating the issue being addressed by this case study
 
1) One sentence clearly stating the issue being addressed by this case study
Line 99: Line 99:
  
 
4) Two or three sentences explaining what the main finding reveals or how the main result adds to previous knowledge.
 
4) Two or three sentences explaining what the main finding reveals or how the main result adds to previous knowledge.
{| class="formtable"
+
{{{field|Summary|input type=textarea|rows=15|cols=100|editor=wikieditor}}}
{{{field|Abstract|input type=textarea|rows=15|cols=100|editor=wikieditor}}}
+
|}
+
 
+
'''Questions Addressed and Wisdom Gained: (suggested format)'''
+
 
+
1) 2-3 sentences summarizing the key questions being addressed by this case study.
+
 
+
2) One sentence summarizing the lesson(s) learned from this case.
+
 
+
3) Two or three sentences providing a broader perspective, readily comprehensible
+
to anyone in any discipline.
+
{| class="formtable"
+
{{{field|Questions and Wisdom|input type=textarea|rows=15|cols=100|editor=wikieditor}}}
+
|}
+
 
+
=Case Review=
+
''The contributing author, other editors, and admins can all provide public case review. Checking any of the boxes below will place a notice at the beginning of the case
+
''
+
''To enhance the ability of a contributor to improve a case, please answer the yes/no questions below. For each "yes" (checked) answer, you should initiate a discussion on the case study discussion page to explain the improvements required.''
+
 
+
''The purpose of this review is to both encourage users to continually improve cases and also to alert readers that there are aspects of the case that could be improved. Any editor/contributor may remove an alert (by unchecking the related box) after the issue has been addressed.''
+
 
+
==Case Completeness==
+
 
+
{{{field|Empty Section|input type=checkbox}}} Are 1 or more sections empty?
+
 
+
{{{field|Clean Up Required|input type=checkbox}}} does the case need more formatting or copyediting help?
+
 
+
{{{field|Expand Section|input type=checkbox}}} Are 1 or more sections incomplete?
+
 
+
{{{field|Add References|input type=checkbox}}} Does the case need additional or better references?
+
 
+
{{{field|Wikify|input type=checkbox}}} Does the case need more internal links (to AquaPedia Pages)?
+
 
+
{{{field|connect to www|input type=checkbox}}} Does the case need more external links (to relevant external sources)?
+
 
+
==Case Content==
+
 
+
{{{field|Disputed|input type=checkbox}}}  Is there a dispute about the accuracy of the content of the case?
+
 
+
{{{field|Mpov|input type=checkbox}}} Is there a need to represent additional points of view?
+
 
+
  
 +
{{Case Review}}
 
{{{end template}}}
 
{{{end template}}}
  

Revision as of 08:25, 25 July 2012


Add the title for your case study. Please choose a title that is descriptive about the setting and purpose for your case:



Example Titles:

Water Quality Control of the South-to-North Water Diversion (SNWD) Middle Route Project (MRP)
Hydropower development in the Nam Ngum River Basin
Can Agricultural Policy Help Save Water and Money in the Apalachicola-Chattahoochee-Flint River Basin?

If there is an existing case study with the same title, you will be sent to a page for editing the existing case.