Difference between revisions of "Form:Case Study"
From AquaPedia Case Study Database
| Line 74: | Line 74: | ||
the interactions between the issues you defined in the previous section. | the interactions between the issues you defined in the previous section. | ||
{{{field|Analysis and Synthesis|holds template}}} | {{{field|Analysis and Synthesis|holds template}}} | ||
| + | {{{for template|Analysis and Synthesis|embed in field=Case Study[Analysis and Synthesis]|add button text=Add Analysis/Synthesis Section}}} | ||
| + | {| class="formtable" | ||
| + | ! Contributors: | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | {{{field|Contributor|list|placeholder= Enter authors who contributed to this section, separated by commas}}} | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | ! Analysis: | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | {{{field|Analysis|input type=textarea|rows=20|cols=100|editor=wikieditor|placeholder=One of the most powerful tools for representing functional relationships among large numbers of interconnected components is network analysis. A network (or graph) is a collection of nodes (vertices) and links (edges) between the nodes. What natural, societal, and political processes and variables were most important in this case? Can you “map” their relationships to each other? Network maps can be provided as scanned hand-made drawings or digitally produced images.}}} | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | ! Synthesis: | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | {{{field|Synthesis|input type=textarea|rows=20|cols=100|editor=wikieditor|placeholder=Synthesize the information you have presented to draw conclusions and highlight important issues and lessons learned. Provide your insight on what knowledge/wisdom from this case can be transferred to other settings}}} | ||
| + | |} {{{field|User|hidden|default=current user}}} | ||
| + | {{{end template}}} | ||
=Key Questions= | =Key Questions= | ||
| Line 139: | Line 154: | ||
{| class="formtable" | {| class="formtable" | ||
! Natural/Societal/Political Domain Variables: | ! Natural/Societal/Political Domain Variables: | ||
| − | | | + | | {{{field|NSPD|property=NSPD|input type=checkboxes|size=6|delimiter=;}}} |
| + | <ol style="float: right; background-color: #E0E0F1"> | ||
| + | <li>Water Quantity (allocation, competitive use, climate influence/uncertainty)</li> | ||
| + | <li>Water Quality (quality for a given purpose, quality from the viewpoint of a stakeholder)</li> | ||
| + | <li>Ecosystems(ecosystem services, biodiversity, ecological communities, environmental considerations)</li> | ||
| + | <li>Governance (institutions, entities, legal frameworks)</li> | ||
| + | <li>Assets (specific human or economic assets)</li> | ||
| + | <li>Values and Norms (social value or cultural norm)</li> | ||
| + | </ol> | ||
|- | |- | ||
! Stakeholder Types: | ! Stakeholder Types: | ||
| {{{field|Stakeholder Type|input type=checkboxes|size=8|property=Stakeholder Type|list}}} | | {{{field|Stakeholder Type|input type=checkboxes|size=8|property=Stakeholder Type|list}}} | ||
|} | |} | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
{{{end template}}} | {{{end template}}} | ||
Revision as of 09:54, 21 June 2012
Add the title for your case study. Please choose a title that is descriptive about the setting and purpose for your case:
Example Titles:
- Water Quality Control of the South-to-North Water Diversion (SNWD) Middle Route Project (MRP)
- Hydropower development in the Nam Ngum River Basin
- Can Agricultural Policy Help Save Water and Money in the Apalachicola-Chattahoochee-Flint River Basin?
If there is an existing case study with the same title, you will be sent to a page for editing the existing case.
