Difference between revisions of "Form:Case Study"
From AquaPedia Case Study Database
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
{{{field|Issues|holds template}}} | {{{field|Issues|holds template}}} | ||
=Analysis and Synthesis= | =Analysis and Synthesis= | ||
| + | Define and Discuss the problem central to your case study. Use this space to describe | ||
| + | the interactions between the issues you defined in the previous section. | ||
{{{field|Analysis and Synthesis|holds template}}} | {{{field|Analysis and Synthesis|holds template}}} | ||
=Key Questions= | =Key Questions= | ||
| Line 58: | Line 60: | ||
}}} | }}} | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | ! Total Watershed Population: | + | ! Total Watershed Population (million): |
| − | | {{{field|Population|property=Population}}} | + | | {{{field|Population|property=Population|size=75|placeholder=Total population of all watersheds or aquifers involved in this case}}} |
|- | |- | ||
| − | ! Total Watershed Area: | + | ! Total Watershed Area (km2): |
| − | | {{{field|Area|property=Area}}} | + | | {{{field|Area|property=Area|size=75|placeholder=Total area of all watersheds or aquifers involved in this case}}} |
|- | |- | ||
! Climate: | ! Climate: | ||
| Line 93: | Line 95: | ||
'''Description''' | '''Description''' | ||
| − | {{{field|Issue Description|input type=textarea|autogrow|cols=150|placeholder=Provide more detail and insight to the issue and fully discuss the stakeholders and variables in relation to the case study. The Analysis section will allow you to discuss the | + | {{{field|Issue Description|input type=textarea|autogrow|cols=150|placeholder=Provide more detail and insight to the issue and fully discuss the stakeholders and variables in relation to the case study. The Analysis section will allow you to discuss the |
relationships between these issues.|editor=wikieditor}}} | relationships between these issues.|editor=wikieditor}}} | ||
| − | '''NSPD:''' {{{field|NSPD|property=NSPD}}} | + | '''NSPD:''' {{{field|NSPD|property=NSPD|input type=listbox|size=6}}} |
'''Stakeholder Types:''' {{{field|Stakeholder Type|input type=listbox|size=8|property=Stakeholder Type|list}}} | '''Stakeholder Types:''' {{{field|Stakeholder Type|input type=listbox|size=8|property=Stakeholder Type|list}}} | ||
| Line 103: | Line 105: | ||
{{{for template|Analysis and Synthesis|multiple|embed in field=Case Study[Analysis and Synthesis]|label=Analysis and Synthesis|add button text=Add Analysis/Synthesis Section}}} | {{{for template|Analysis and Synthesis|multiple|embed in field=Case Study[Analysis and Synthesis]|label=Analysis and Synthesis|add button text=Add Analysis/Synthesis Section}}} | ||
| − | + | Analysis: | |
| − | {{{field| | + | {{{field|Analysis|input type=textarea|autogrow|cols=150|editor=wikieditor|placeholder=One of the most powerful tools for representing functional relationships among large numbers of interconnected components is network analysis. A network (or graph) is a collection of nodes (vertices) and links (edges) between the nodes. What natural, societal, and political processes and variables were most important in this case? Can you “map” their relationships to each other? Network maps can be provided as scanned hand-made drawings or digitally produced images.}}} |
Synthesis: | Synthesis: | ||
| − | {{{field|Synthesis|input type=textarea|autogrow|cols=150|editor=wikieditor}}} | + | {{{field|Synthesis|input type=textarea|autogrow|cols=150|editor=wikieditor|placeholder=Synthesize the information you have presented to draw conclusions and highlight important issues and lessons learned. Provide your insight on what knowledge/wisdom from this case can be transferred to other settings}}} |
{{{field|User|hidden|default=current user}}} | {{{field|User|hidden|default=current user}}} | ||
{{{end template}}} | {{{end template}}} | ||
Revision as of 09:12, 1 June 2012
