Addressing the Transboundary Water Conflict Between the Blue Nile Riparian States

From AquaPedia Case Study Database
Revision as of 13:43, 8 May 2013 by Thenry01 (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Jump to: navigation, search
{{#var: location map}}


Case Description
Loading map...
Geolocation: 11° 17' 18.9506", 34° 7' 25.8164"
Total Population 210210,000,000 millionmillion
Total Area 324,500324,500 km²
125,289.45 mi²
km2
Climate Descriptors Semi-arid/steppe (Köppen B-type), Arid/desert (Köppen B-type)
Predominent Land Use Descriptors agricultural- cropland and pasture, urban- high density
Important Uses of Water Agriculture or Irrigation, Domestic/Urban Supply, Fisheries - farmed, Hydropower Generation, Livestock

Summary

Natural, Historic, Economic, Regional, and Political Framework

Analysis, Synthesis, and Insight

What is an ASI?

Individuals may add their own Analysis, Synthesis, and Insight (ASI) to a case. ASI sub-articles are protected, so that each contributor retains authorship and control of their own content. Edit the case to add your own ASI.

Learn more

ASI:Suggested Negotiation Approaches for Mitigating the Ongoing Blue Nile Conflict

The key to mitigating the negative effects of power asymmetry in water negotiations is to expand the proverbial pie by creating additional value and diversifying the menu of negotiating agenda items. This should include efforts to move away from viewing the Nile as a fixed resource towards the efficient and effective use, reuse, and repurposing of the Nile waters.(read the full article... )

Contributed by: Tameisha Henry (last edit: 13 May 2013)