Seperating foriegn interests from the main dispute

About this Article
Contributed by:AEZ

Article last edited 10 May 2014 by Alonaeshed
Article originally added by Alonaeshed

What is an ASI Article? Individuals may add their own Analysis, Synthesis, and Insight (ASI) to a case by linking a case to an ASI article. These ASI articles are protected, so that each person who creates a section retains control of their own content. Please use the discussion page for commenting on this article. Learn More

This article is linked to

1. Is it possible to use mutual studies and research to conduct an energy exploration survey, which can create a clearer picture of the energy reserves? The dispute between the littoral states on their share of the Caspian is not allowing for data collection regarding its energy reserves. In fact, it seems that one of the main reasons the littoral states are finding it so hard to compromise is the lack of certainty as to what it is exactly that they are giving up on. Since energy has a highly precious value in terms of both profits and political power this is not likely to change unless there is more certainty in the estimation of the reserves. Gathering more data, can bring the parties to have a more specific discussion on their demands, and leave more room for a creative package creates more value.

2. If large external parties with foriegn interests are invited to join negotiations as observers, can that create more responsiblity on their behalf to motivate the parties to reach an agreement rather than push their own foriegn interests? Behind the scenes, large global actors such as the US are pulling strings in order to advance their interest of exploring the region’s energy resources further. Indirectly, these actors are affecting the interests of the littoral states.

3.Are the littoral states sincere about their commitment to preserve the environment? It seems like the countries are officially positive about using the conventions to reach a broad agreement that includes all issues, and certainly to advance environmental issues, however in essence it is not clear how sincere they are about acting upon their proposed intents. Their agreement on a plan regarding the environmental issues does not seem to have much impact as each party is expected to follow a national plan, but cooperation between them according to the plan is minimal, meetings are rare, there is no mechnism of enforcement or dispute resolution and in general the language of the agreement is very vague.