Help:Content validity

From AquaPedia Case Study Database
Revision as of 06:09, 19 April 2012 by Amanda (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

It is important that all information provided to an AquaPedia case study is

  • clear
  • consise
  • accurate as possible

Most case study sections require that the author maintain a neutral point of view. The Analysis and Synthesis Section of a case study allows the author to provide qualified statements, researched opinions, and other non-neutral information or wisdom.


Cases or Case Sections that do not

  • provide sufficient references
  • appear to be neutrally presented

may be flagged by a Trusted User or Editor as requiring additional fact-checking, edits for clarity/factuality, or other improvements to improve the validity of the content.