Difference between revisions of "Help:Content validity"
From AquaPedia Case Study Database
(Created page with "It is important that all information provided to an AquaPedia case study is *clear *consise *accurate as possible Most case study sections require that the author maintain a...") |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 06:09, 19 April 2012
It is important that all information provided to an AquaPedia case study is
- clear
- consise
- accurate as possible
Most case study sections require that the author maintain a neutral point of view. The Analysis and Synthesis Section of a case study allows the author to provide qualified statements, researched opinions, and other non-neutral information or wisdom.
Cases or Case Sections that do not
- provide sufficient references
- appear to be neutrally presented
may be flagged by a Trusted User or Editor as requiring additional fact-checking, edits for clarity/factuality, or other improvements to improve the validity of the content.
