Difference between revisions of "Form:Case Study"
From AquaPedia Case Study Database
Line 72: | Line 72: | ||
Please use this section to analyze interactions between issues and stakeholders, synthesize information presented, draw conclusions, highlight important lessons learned, or to provide insight into the knowledge/wisdom from this case can be transferred to other settings. | Please use this section to analyze interactions between issues and stakeholders, synthesize information presented, draw conclusions, highlight important lessons learned, or to provide insight into the knowledge/wisdom from this case can be transferred to other settings. | ||
− | + | {{{field|ASI|holds template}}} | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
=Key Questions= | =Key Questions= | ||
Line 101: | Line 92: | ||
{{{field|Summary|input type=textarea|rows=15|cols=100|editor=wikieditor}}} | {{{field|Summary|input type=textarea|rows=15|cols=100|editor=wikieditor}}} | ||
− | {{Case | + | =Case Review= |
+ | ''The contributing author, other editors, and admins can all provide public case review. Checking any of the boxes below will place a notice at the beginning of the case | ||
+ | '' | ||
+ | ''To enhance the ability of a contributor to improve a case, please answer the yes/no questions below. For each "yes" (checked) answer, you should initiate a discussion on the case study discussion page to explain the improvements required.'' | ||
+ | |||
+ | ''The purpose of this review is to both encourage users to continually improve cases and also to alert readers that there are aspects of the case that could be improved. Any editor/contributor may remove an alert (by unchecking the related box) after the issue has been addressed.'' | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Case Completeness== | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{{field|Empty Section|input type=checkbox}}} Are 1 or more sections empty? | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{{field|Clean Up Required|input type=checkbox}}} does the case need more formatting or copyediting help? | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{{field|Expand Section|input type=checkbox}}} Are 1 or more sections incomplete? | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{{field|Add References|input type=checkbox}}} Does the case need additional or better references? | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{{field|Wikify|input type=checkbox}}} Does the case need more internal links (to AquaPedia Pages)? | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{{field|connect to www|input type=checkbox}}} Does the case need more external links (to relevant external sources)? | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Case Content== | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{{field|Disputed|input type=checkbox}}} Is there a dispute about the accuracy of the content of the case? | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{{field|Mpov|input type=checkbox}}} Is there a need to represent additional points of view? | ||
+ | |||
{{{end template}}} | {{{end template}}} | ||
Line 124: | Line 141: | ||
'''Description:''' | '''Description:''' | ||
{| class="formtable" | {| class="formtable" | ||
− | {{{field|Issue Description|input type=textarea|autogrow|cols=100|placeholder=Provide more detail and insight to the issue and fully discuss the stakeholders and variables in relation to the case study. The Analysis section will allow you to discuss the | + | {{{field|Issue Description|input type=textarea|autogrow |cols=100 |placeholder=Provide more detail and insight to the issue and fully discuss the stakeholders and variables in relation to the case study. The Analysis section will allow you to discuss the relationships between these issues. |editor=wikieditor}}} |
− | relationships between these issues.|editor=wikieditor}}} | + | |
|} | |} | ||
Line 145: | Line 161: | ||
|} | |} | ||
+ | {{{end template}}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{{for template|ASI|multiple|embed in field=Case Study[ASI]|add button text=Add Your Own Analysis}}} | ||
+ | {| class="formtable" | ||
+ | ! Contributors: | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | {{{field|Contributor|list|placeholder= Enter authors who contributed to this section, separated by commas}}} | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ! Analysis, Synthesis, and Insight: | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | {{{field|ASI|input type=textarea|rows=20|cols=100| editor=wikieditor |placeholder=One of the most powerful tools for representing functional relationships among large numbers of interconnected components is network analysis. A network (or graph) is a collection of nodes (vertices) and links (edges) between the nodes. What natural, societal, and political processes and variables were most important in this case? Can you “map” their relationships to each other? Network maps can be provided as scanned hand-made drawings or digitally produced images. Synthesize the information you have presented to draw conclusions and highlight important issues and lessons learned. Provide your insight on what knowledge/wisdom from this case can be transferred to other settings}}} | ||
+ | |} {{{field|User|hidden|default=current user}}} | ||
{{{end template}}} | {{{end template}}} | ||
Line 164: | Line 192: | ||
{{{field|Key Question - Desalination|property=Key Question|input type= radiobutton|values= What roles can desalination play in a country's national water policy and what energy, ecological and water quality considerations ought to go into making such a decision?, What types of benefit sharing models can be used to make desalination more economically feasible and beneficial in water-scarce regions?}}} | {{{field|Key Question - Desalination|property=Key Question|input type= radiobutton|values= What roles can desalination play in a country's national water policy and what energy, ecological and water quality considerations ought to go into making such a decision?, What types of benefit sharing models can be used to make desalination more economically feasible and beneficial in water-scarce regions?}}} | ||
</div><div id="Influence" class="Questions"> | </div><div id="Influence" class="Questions"> | ||
− | {{{field|Key Question - Influence|property=Key Question|input type=radiobutton|values=To what extent can international actors and movements from civil society influence water management? How and when is this beneficial/detrimental and how can these effects be supported/mitigated?, How can government be dis/incentivized to offer an inclusive planning process?, What effective mechanisms can downstream states/countries use to protect their water related interests/rights?, How does asymmetry of power influence water negotiations and how can the negative effects be mitigated?}}} | + | {{{field|Key Question - Influence|property=Key Question |input type=radiobutton |values=To what extent can international actors and movements from civil society influence water management? How and when is this beneficial/detrimental and how can these effects be supported/mitigated?, How can government be dis/incentivized to offer an inclusive planning process?, What effective mechanisms can downstream states/countries use to protect their water related interests/rights?, How does asymmetry of power influence water negotiations and how can the negative effects be mitigated?}}} |
</div><div id="Industries" class="Questions"> | </div><div id="Industries" class="Questions"> | ||
− | {{{field|Key Question - Industries|property=Key Question|input type=radiobutton|values= How can consultation and cooperation among stakeholders and development partners be better facilitated/managed/fostered?}}} | + | {{{field|Key Question - Industries|property=Key Question |input type=radiobutton |values= How can consultation and cooperation among stakeholders and development partners be better facilitated/managed/fostered?}}} |
</div> | </div> | ||
|} | |} |
Revision as of 08:58, 26 July 2012
Add the title for your case study. Please choose a title that is descriptive about the setting and purpose for your case:
Example Titles:
- Water Quality Control of the South-to-North Water Diversion (SNWD) Middle Route Project (MRP)
- Hydropower development in the Nam Ngum River Basin
- Can Agricultural Policy Help Save Water and Money in the Apalachicola-Chattahoochee-Flint River Basin?
If there is an existing case study with the same title, you will be sent to a page for editing the existing case.