Difference between revisions of "The Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery and San Juan River Basin Recovery Implementation Programs"
m (Saved using "Save and continue" button in form) |
m (Saved using "Save and continue" button in form) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
'''Stakeholders:''' | '''Stakeholders:''' | ||
* Colorado | * Colorado | ||
| − | * | + | * Wyoming |
| − | + | * Utah | |
| − | + | * New Mexico | |
| − | + | * The U.S. Department of the Interior | |
| − | + | * The Western Area Power Administration | |
| − | + | * Jicarilla Apache Nation | |
| − | + | * The Southern Ute Tribe | |
| − | + | * The Ute Mountain Ute | |
| − | + | * The Navajo Nation | |
| − | + | * The U.S. Bureau of Reclamation | |
| − | + | * The U.S. Bureau of Land Management | |
| − | + | * The Nature Conservancy | |
| − | + | * The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service | |
| − | + | * Upper Basin Water users and associations | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
|NSPD=Water Quantity; Water Quality; Ecosystems | |NSPD=Water Quantity; Water Quality; Ecosystems | ||
|Stakeholder Type=Federated state/territorial/provincial government, Sovereign state/national/federal government, Non-legislative governmental agency, Environmental interest, Industry/Corporate Interest | |Stakeholder Type=Federated state/territorial/provincial government, Sovereign state/national/federal government, Non-legislative governmental agency, Environmental interest, Industry/Corporate Interest | ||
}} | }} | ||
|Key Questions={{Key Question | |Key Questions={{Key Question | ||
| + | |Subject=Hydropower Dams and Large Storage Infrastructure | ||
| + | }}{{Key Question | ||
|Subject=Hydropower Dams and Large Storage Infrastructure | |Subject=Hydropower Dams and Large Storage Infrastructure | ||
}}{{Key Question | }}{{Key Question | ||
|Subject=Hydropower Dams and Large Storage Infrastructure | |Subject=Hydropower Dams and Large Storage Infrastructure | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | |Water Feature={{Link Water Feature}}{{Link Water Feature}} | + | |Water Feature={{Link Water Feature}}{{Link Water Feature}}{{Link Water Feature}} |
| − | |Riparian={{Link Riparian}}{{Link Riparian}} | + | |Riparian={{Link Riparian}}{{Link Riparian}}{{Link Riparian}} |
|Water Project= | |Water Project= | ||
|Agreement= | |Agreement= | ||
Revision as of 17:18, 21 May 2017
| Geolocation: | 37° 11' 7.9289", -110° 53' 37.6294" |
|---|---|
| Total Population | 88,000,000 millionmillion |
| Total Area | 280,000280,000 km² 108,108 mi² km2 |
| Climate Descriptors | Arid/desert (Köppen B-type), alpine |
| Predominent Land Use Descriptors | conservation lands |
| Important Uses of Water | Agriculture or Irrigation, Domestic/Urban Supply, Hydropower Generation, Other Ecological Services |
| Water Features: | |
| Riparians: |
Contents
Summary
Over eight million people in one of the United States’ most water stressed regions depend on water from the Upper Colorado River Basin, including the San Juan River. From 1960 to 1990, the Upper Basin states experienced large population growth. During the same period, Congress passed the Endangered Species Act (ESA) in 1973 protecting imperiled species. (Endangered Species Act of 1973).
The passage of the ESA along with increased pressures on the basin’s resources set the stage for potential conflict over imperiled fish species in the river systems among the region’s water users, environmentalists, and the government. In 1983, FWS drafted a proposal to protect four endangered species in the Colorado River: the Colorado pikeminnow, the humpback chub, the bonytail, and the razorback sucker. The threat posed by potential ESA-related lawsuits set the stage for the creation of the Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery and San Juan River Basin Recovery Implementation Programs.
Stakeholder groups composed of water users, government agencies, Native American tribes, Upper Basin states, and environmentalists created the Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish Recovery and San Juan River Basin Recovery Implementation Programs in 1988 and 1992 respectively. These Programs allow water users the right to continue to develop their legal water rights and construct water projects while protecting and recovering the fishes through flow management, habitat restoration, hatchery releases, control of nonnatives, beneficial capital projects, and research into the species’ natural histories.
The Programs have stabilized and increased the populations of all four species, though only two of the four species will likely be delisted by the official end of the program in 2023. At the same time, the Programs have facilitated the development of 2,500 water projects by granting them automatic compliance through the Programs, instead of necessitating project-specific ESA review.
The Programs have achieved success for a variety of reasons. The initial negotiation environment encouraged the parties to collaborative on creative solutions with limited alternatives to this approach. The Programs have achieved ongoing success due to working transparently, openly engaging stakeholders across sectors, focusing on science-based results, adaptively managing the program, fostering grassroots support and turning this into political support, providing on the ground funding, simplifying water project development, and establishing trust and relationships among the involved stakeholders over more than two decades.
Natural, Historic, Economic, Regional, and Political Framework
Issues and Stakeholders
Conflict between maintaining water flows and habitat for legally protected endangered fish and water users with legal rights to water consumption in the Upper Colorado Basin
NSPD: Water Quantity, Water Quality, Ecosystems
Stakeholder Types: Federated state/territorial/provincial government, Sovereign state/national/federal government, Non-legislative governmental agency, Environmental interest, Industry/Corporate Interest
Water users want to maintain their legal rights to the Colorado and San Juan Rivers’ water resources. At the same time, the federal Endangered Species Act, supported by environmental groups, mandates that four protected species within the rivers have adequate water flows and quality and protected habitat.
Stakeholders:
- Colorado
- Wyoming
- Utah
- New Mexico
- The U.S. Department of the Interior
- The Western Area Power Administration
- Jicarilla Apache Nation
- The Southern Ute Tribe
- The Ute Mountain Ute
- The Navajo Nation
- The U.S. Bureau of Reclamation
- The U.S. Bureau of Land Management
- The Nature Conservancy
- The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
- Upper Basin Water users and associations
Analysis, Synthesis, and Insight
Individuals may add their own Analysis, Synthesis, and Insight (ASI) to a case. ASI sub-articles are protected, so that each contributor retains authorship and control of their own content. Edit the case to add your own ASI.
Learn moreNo ASI articles have been added yet for this case
Key Questions
Hydropower Dams and Large Storage Infrastructure:
no description entered
Hydropower Dams and Large Storage Infrastructure:
no description entered
Hydropower Dams and Large Storage Infrastructure:
no description entered
