Difference between revisions of "Form:Case Study"
From AquaPedia Case Study Database
| Line 101: | Line 101: | ||
| order=DESC | | order=DESC | ||
| default=There are no case reflections related to this Case Study.}} | | default=There are no case reflections related to this Case Study.}} | ||
| + | |||
Please use this section to analyze interactions between issues and stakeholders, synthesize information presented, draw conclusions, highlight important lessons learned, or to provide insight into the knowledge/wisdom from this case can be transferred to other settings. Please start your own section, rather than editing the contributions of others. | Please use this section to analyze interactions between issues and stakeholders, synthesize information presented, draw conclusions, highlight important lessons learned, or to provide insight into the knowledge/wisdom from this case can be transferred to other settings. Please start your own section, rather than editing the contributions of others. | ||
Revision as of 23:45, 25 October 2012
Add the title for your case study. Please choose a descriptive title that captures the setting and purpose for your case:
Example Titles:
- Water Quality Control of the South-to-North Water Diversion (SNWD) Middle Route Project (MRP)
- Hydropower development in the Nam Ngum River Basin
- Can Agricultural Policy Help Save Water and Money in the Apalachicola-Chattahoochee-Flint River Basin?
If there is an existing case study with the same title, you will be sent to a page for editing the existing case.
