Difference between revisions of "Form:Case Study"

From AquaPedia Case Study Database
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 81: Line 81:
 
=Analysis, Synthesis, Insights=
 
=Analysis, Synthesis, Insights=
 
For each case, multiple contributors will have the opportunity to add his/her own analysis/synthesis or insights into the specific case, and these nuanced, contextual additions will be presented together in the case to provide multiple viewpoints. Because of this, each contributor will need to both add and annotate their contributions to this section to highlight major points and also receive credit for the original thoughts.  
 
For each case, multiple contributors will have the opportunity to add his/her own analysis/synthesis or insights into the specific case, and these nuanced, contextual additions will be presented together in the case to provide multiple viewpoints. Because of this, each contributor will need to both add and annotate their contributions to this section to highlight major points and also receive credit for the original thoughts.  
 +
 +
=== ASIs already associated with this Study ===
 +
 +
{{#ask: [[Case Reflection:+]] [[Case Study::{{PAGENAME}}]]
 +
| format=template
 +
| template=Case Reflection Form Summary
 +
| link=all
 +
| sort=Last Edited
 +
| order=DESC
 +
| default=There are no case reflections related to this Case Study.}}
 +
 +
=== ASIs on this study that you have already contributed to ===
 +
 +
{{#ask: [[Case Reflection:+]] [[Case Study::{{PAGENAME}}]] [[Contributor::~{{#USERNAME:}}]]
 +
| format=template
 +
| template=Case Reflection Form Summary
 +
| link=all
 +
| sort=Last Edited
 +
| order=DESC
 +
| default=There are no case reflections related to this Case Study.}}
  
 
Please use this section to analyze interactions between issues and stakeholders, synthesize information presented, draw conclusions, highlight important lessons learned, or to provide insight into the knowledge/wisdom from this case can be transferred to other settings.  Please start your own section, rather than editing the contributions of others.
 
Please use this section to analyze interactions between issues and stakeholders, synthesize information presented, draw conclusions, highlight important lessons learned, or to provide insight into the knowledge/wisdom from this case can be transferred to other settings.  Please start your own section, rather than editing the contributions of others.
{{{field|ASI|holds template}}}
+
 
 +
{{#forminput:form=Case Reflection|query string=namespace=Case_Reflection&Case Reflection[Case Study]={{PAGENAME}}|button text=Add a Case Reflection|size=50}}
  
 
=Key Questions=
 
=Key Questions=

Revision as of 23:44, 25 October 2012


Add the title for your case study. Please choose a descriptive title that captures the setting and purpose for your case:



Example Titles:

Water Quality Control of the South-to-North Water Diversion (SNWD) Middle Route Project (MRP)
Hydropower development in the Nam Ngum River Basin
Can Agricultural Policy Help Save Water and Money in the Apalachicola-Chattahoochee-Flint River Basin?

If there is an existing case study with the same title, you will be sent to a page for editing the existing case.