Difference between revisions of "Form:Case Study"
From AquaPedia Case Study Database
(Case Review checkboxes and some minor "help" text changes) |
|||
| Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
=Historic, Economic and Political Framework= | =Historic, Economic and Political Framework= | ||
{| class="formtable" | {| class="formtable" | ||
| − | {{{field|REP Framework|input type=textarea|rows=20|cols=100 |placeholder=Longstanding political, social, | + | {{{field|REP Framework|input type=textarea|rows=20|cols=100 |placeholder=Longstanding political, social/cultural, environmental/scientific, and economic factors play a significant role in shaping water issues for any region. Please discuss any background topics that are important for understanding the complexity of the case and how the issues of this case interact.|editor=wikieditor}}} |
|} | |} | ||
=Issues and Stakeholders= | =Issues and Stakeholders= | ||
| − | Issues are concerns of groups of stakeholders within the context of the water basin and the case study. | + | Issues are the concerns of groups of stakeholders within the context of the water basin and the case study. Some issues may be extremely significant, and some may be peripheral to your particular perspective or framework. |
| − | + | ||
| − | Some issues may be extremely significant, and some may be peripheral to your particular perspective or framework. | + | |
Each issue has a specific group of stakeholders. Stakeholders are organizations or powerful individuals who may have input into the process or may bear the results of management decisions in the water basin. The stakeholders for a given issue are those who have a primary concern in its outcome. | Each issue has a specific group of stakeholders. Stakeholders are organizations or powerful individuals who may have input into the process or may bear the results of management decisions in the water basin. The stakeholders for a given issue are those who have a primary concern in its outcome. | ||
| Line 71: | Line 69: | ||
=Analysis, Synthesis, Insights= | =Analysis, Synthesis, Insights= | ||
| − | + | For each case, multiple contributors will have the opportunity to add his/her own analysis/synthesis or insights into the specific case, and these nuanced, contextual additions will be presented together in the case to provide multiple viewpoints. Because of this, each contributor will need to both add and annotate their contributions to this section to highlight major points and also receive credit for the original thoughts. | |
| + | |||
| + | Please use this section to analyze interactions between issues and stakeholders, synthesize information presented, draw conclusions, highlight important lessons learned, or to provide insight into the knowledge/wisdom from this case can be transferred to other settings. | ||
{| class="formtable" | {| class="formtable" | ||
| Line 120: | Line 120: | ||
=Case Review= | =Case Review= | ||
| + | ''The contributing author, other editors, and admins can all provide public case review. Checking any of the boxes below will place a notice at the beginning of the case | ||
| + | '' | ||
| + | ''To enhance the ability of a contributor to improve a case, please answer the yes/no questions below. For each "yes" (checked) answer, you should initiate a discussion on the case study discussion page to explain the improvements required.'' | ||
| − | + | ''The purpose of this review is to both encourage users to continually improve cases and also to alert readers that there are aspects of the case that could be improved. Any editor/contributor may remove an alert (by unchecking the related box) after the issue has been addressed.'' | |
| + | |||
| + | ==Case Completeness== | ||
{{{field|Empty Section|input type=checkbox}}} Are 1 or more sections empty? | {{{field|Empty Section|input type=checkbox}}} Are 1 or more sections empty? | ||
| Line 129: | Line 134: | ||
{{{field|Expand Section|input type=checkbox}}} Are 1 or more sections incomplete? | {{{field|Expand Section|input type=checkbox}}} Are 1 or more sections incomplete? | ||
| − | {{{field|Add References|input type=checkbox}}} Does the case need better references? | + | {{{field|Add References|input type=checkbox}}} Does the case need additional or better references? |
| + | {{{field|wikify|input type=checkbox}}} Does the case need more internal links (to AquaPedia Pages)? | ||
| − | + | {{{field|connect to www|input type=checkbox}}} Does the case need more external links (to relevant external sources)? | |
| + | |||
| + | ==Case Content== | ||
{{{field|Disputed|input type=checkbox}}} Is there a dispute about the accuracy of the content of the case? | {{{field|Disputed|input type=checkbox}}} Is there a dispute about the accuracy of the content of the case? | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{{field|Mpov|input type=checkbox}}} Is there a need to represent additional points of view? | ||
Revision as of 11:50, 16 July 2012
Add the title for your case study. Please choose a title that is descriptive about the setting and purpose for your case:
Example Titles:
- Water Quality Control of the South-to-North Water Diversion (SNWD) Middle Route Project (MRP)
- Hydropower development in the Nam Ngum River Basin
- Can Agricultural Policy Help Save Water and Money in the Apalachicola-Chattahoochee-Flint River Basin?
If there is an existing case study with the same title, you will be sent to a page for editing the existing case.
