Difference between revisions of "Form:Case Study"
From AquaPedia Case Study Database
| (5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
<div id="wikiPreview" style="display: none; padding-bottom: 25px; margin-bottom: 25px; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"></div> | <div id="wikiPreview" style="display: none; padding-bottom: 25px; margin-bottom: 25px; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"></div> | ||
=Case Description= | =Case Description= | ||
| + | '' '''Descriptive terms, facts, and summary for this case.''' '' | ||
| + | Each of these checkboxes or numerical values are designed to support semantic search. Please provide thoughtful answers that relate closely to your case and would assist others in searching for this case or common elements between cases. You can elaborate on these responses in other "free text" sections of your case. If you add comments to numerical fields in this page, they won't be recorded or displayed properly. | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
{| class="formtable" | {| class="formtable" | ||
| − | ! | + | ! scope="col" width="70px" | Water Use: |
| − | + | |''Indicate 3 – 5 uses of water most important to this case study:'' | |
| − | | | + | |
| − | + | ||
| − | | | + | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | | ||
| − | | {{{field| | + | | {{{field|Water Use|property=Water Use|input type=checkboxes|size=11}}} |
|- | |- | ||
! Land Use: | ! Land Use: | ||
| − | |''Indicate 2 | + | |''Indicate 2 – 5 land use terms most important to this case study:'' |
|- | |- | ||
| | | | ||
| {{{field|Land Use|property=Land Use|input type=checkboxes|size=10}}} | | {{{field|Land Use|property=Land Use|input type=checkboxes|size=10}}} | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | ! | + | ! Climate: |
| − | |'' | + | |''Select any climate descriptors that may describe relevant climate types present in the case study region'' |
|- | |- | ||
| | | | ||
| − | | {{{field| | + | | {{{field|Climate|property=Climate|input type=checkboxes|size=12|delimiter=;}}} |
|} | |} | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | {| | ||
| + | |-valign="top" | ||
| + | | width="320px" | '''Case Population:''' {{#info: ''Total population for this case -- this could be watershed population, a population of a geographic area, or a combination of these types of statistics -- How many people were/are affected? '' }} {{{field|Population|property=Population|size=6}}} million<br /> | ||
| + | | width="320px"| '''Total Area :''' {{#info: ''Total area for this case -- this might be a sum of watersheds/aquifers recharge area/ or a simple geographic area'' }} {{{field|Area|property=Area|size=6}}} km<sup>2</sup> <br /> | ||
| + | |} | ||
| + | |||
| + | {| cellpadding="5" | ||
| + | |- valign="top" | ||
| + | | width="100pt" | '''Map Location''' {{#info: Choose a location to place a marker that will represent this case on a map. You can enter the coordinates directly, or click on the map, or enter an address and choose "Look up coordinates." The coordinates will be stored when you save this page.}} | ||
| + | | width="360pt" | {{{field|Geolocation| input type=googlemaps| width=350| height=200| zoom=1| autozoom=on}}} | ||
| + | |} | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ''This is the end of the Case Description section. Consider previewing or saving your changes and continue to other sections using the tabs above.'' | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | =Issues and Stakeholders= | ||
| + | Issues are the concerns of groups of stakeholders within the context of the water basin and the case study. Some issues may be extremely significant, and some may be peripheral to your particular perspective or framework. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Each issue has a specific group of stakeholders. Stakeholders are organizations or powerful individuals who may have input into the process or may bear the results of management decisions in the water basin. The stakeholders for a given issue are those who have a primary concern in its outcome. | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{{field|Issues|holds template}}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | =Key Questions= | ||
| + | The greatest value of any case study is the ability to identify transferable knowledge, particularly identifying the context and usefulness of this knowledge. Select a few questions from the question bank and provide a brief synopsis on the contributions this case study makes to providing more insight or answering this question. | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{{field|Key Questions|holds template}}} | ||
=Background Articles= | =Background Articles= | ||
| Line 76: | Line 96: | ||
! Agreements or Treaties: || {{{field|Agreement|holds template|list}}} | ! Agreements or Treaties: || {{{field|Agreement|holds template|list}}} | ||
|} | |} | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
=Historic, Economic and Political Framework= | =Historic, Economic and Political Framework= | ||
| Line 85: | Line 108: | ||
|} | |} | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
=Analysis, Synthesis & Insights (ASI)= | =Analysis, Synthesis & Insights (ASI)= | ||
| Line 119: | Line 136: | ||
<span class="pops">[[Form:ASI|Add an ASI]]</span> | <span class="pops">[[Form:ASI|Add an ASI]]</span> | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
=Summary= | =Summary= | ||
| Line 132: | Line 144: | ||
''We suggest the case summary is '''kept under 300 words''' and touches on the following topics: major issues addressed, important stakeholders, major points of analysis/synthesis/insights (especially if there are multiple contributors of insight to the case), opportunities for transferrable knowledge. This is not meant to be fully comprehensive, but simply provide enough information to a reader to indicate whether or not s/he is interested in reading further.'' | ''We suggest the case summary is '''kept under 300 words''' and touches on the following topics: major issues addressed, important stakeholders, major points of analysis/synthesis/insights (especially if there are multiple contributors of insight to the case), opportunities for transferrable knowledge. This is not meant to be fully comprehensive, but simply provide enough information to a reader to indicate whether or not s/he is interested in reading further.'' | ||
| − | |||
{{{field|Summary|input type=textarea|rows=15|cols=100|editor=wikieditor}}} | {{{field|Summary|input type=textarea|rows=15|cols=100|editor=wikieditor}}} | ||
| Line 148: | Line 159: | ||
{{{field|Topic Tags|holds template|list}}} | {{{field|Topic Tags|holds template|list}}} | ||
| − | + | '''References''' | |
| + | Please list all reference here. use (name date) parenthetical citations in relevant text areas. | ||
| + | {{{field|Refs|input type=textarea|rows=10|cols=100|editor=wikieditor}}} | ||
=External Links= | =External Links= | ||
| Line 238: | Line 251: | ||
{{{field|Key Question - Urban|property=Key Question|input type=radiobutton|values=What approaches are most beneficial for rapidly growing cities in the developing world to link water management to sustainable urban growth strategy?, How can increasing urban water demand be balanced between the needs of the urban population and industry?, How can costs for water quality projects be distributed between polluters and beneficiaries?}}} | {{{field|Key Question - Urban|property=Key Question|input type=radiobutton|values=What approaches are most beneficial for rapidly growing cities in the developing world to link water management to sustainable urban growth strategy?, How can increasing urban water demand be balanced between the needs of the urban population and industry?, How can costs for water quality projects be distributed between polluters and beneficiaries?}}} | ||
</div><div id="Transboundary" class="Questions"> | </div><div id="Transboundary" class="Questions"> | ||
| − | {{{field|Key Question - Transboundary|property=Key Question|input type=radiobutton|values=What kinds of water treaties or agreements between countries can provide sufficient structure and stability to ensure enforceability but also be flexible and adaptable given future uncertainties?, What mechanisms beyond simple allocation can be incorporated into transboundary water agreements to add value and facilitate resolution?, What considerations can be given to incorporating collaborative adaptive management (CAM)? What efforts have the parties made to review and adjust a solution or decision over time in light of changing conditions?, How can packages or options that link issues creatively or build on possible technology innovations be employed to create non-zero sum choices within negotiations that include water resources? | + | {{{field|Key Question - Transboundary|property=Key Question|input type=radiobutton|values=What kinds of water treaties or agreements between countries can provide sufficient structure and stability to ensure enforceability but also be flexible and adaptable given future uncertainties?, What mechanisms beyond simple allocation can be incorporated into transboundary water agreements to add value and facilitate resolution?, What considerations can be given to incorporating collaborative adaptive management (CAM)? What efforts have the parties made to review and adjust a solution or decision over time in light of changing conditions?, How can packages or options that link issues creatively or build on possible technology innovations be employed to create non-zero sum choices within negotiations that include water resources?, How can mutual trust amongst riparians be nurtured? What actions erode that trust? |
}}} | }}} | ||
</div><div id="Innovation" class="Questions"> | </div><div id="Innovation" class="Questions"> | ||
| − | {{{field|Key Question - Desalination|property=Key Question|input type= radiobutton|values= What roles can desalination play in a country's national water policy and what energy | + | {{{field|Key Question - Desalination|property=Key Question|input type= radiobutton|values= What roles can desalination play in a country's national water policy and what energy ecological and water quality considerations ought to go into making such a decision?, What types of benefit sharing models can be used to make desalination more economically feasible and beneficial in water-scarce regions?}}} |
</div><div id="Influence" class="Questions"> | </div><div id="Influence" class="Questions"> | ||
{{{field|Key Question - Influence|property=Key Question |input type=radiobutton |values=To what extent can international actors and movements from civil society influence water management? How and when is this beneficial/detrimental and how can these effects be supported/mitigated?, How can government be dis/incentivized to offer an inclusive planning process?, What effective mechanisms can downstream states/countries use to protect their water related interests/rights?, How does asymmetry of power influence water negotiations and how can the negative effects be mitigated?, How do national policies influence water use at the local level?}}} | {{{field|Key Question - Influence|property=Key Question |input type=radiobutton |values=To what extent can international actors and movements from civil society influence water management? How and when is this beneficial/detrimental and how can these effects be supported/mitigated?, How can government be dis/incentivized to offer an inclusive planning process?, What effective mechanisms can downstream states/countries use to protect their water related interests/rights?, How does asymmetry of power influence water negotiations and how can the negative effects be mitigated?, How do national policies influence water use at the local level?}}} | ||
Latest revision as of 14:03, 23 January 2015
Add the title for your case study. Please choose a descriptive title that captures the setting and purpose for your case:
Example Titles:
- Water Quality Control of the South-to-North Water Diversion (SNWD) Middle Route Project (MRP), China
- Hydropower development in the Nam Ngum River Basin
- Can Agricultural Policy Help Save Water and Money in the Apalachicola-Chattahoochee-Flint River Basin?
If there is an existing case study with the same title, you will be sent to a page for editing the existing case. You may want to check the list of case studies to see if there are opportunities to add to an existing case, rather than create a new one.
