Difference between revisions of "Kura-Araks River"
From AquaPedia Case Study Database
| [checked revision] | [checked revision] |
Mpritchard (Talk | contribs) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Water Feature | {{Water Feature | ||
| − | |Type=river | + | |Type=river or creek |
|Length=1,072 | |Length=1,072 | ||
|Description=The reason that Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia are being forced to confront the issue of the Kura-Araks River is because of problems of pollution. The river is heavily contaminated by chemical, industrial, biological, agricultural and radioactive pollutants. The failure of wastewater treatment plants plays a major role in this dilemma in that the actual amount of water that is being treated is less than a decade ago. The concentrations of contaminants in the Kura-Araks reach levels that are much higher than standards in any of the three countries or internationally as well. Azerbaijan, the downstream nation, and lacking groundwater resources like Georgia or Armenia, depends on the Kura-Araks for the majority of its agricultural, industrial and household use.<ref name = "TFDD 2012">Product of the [http://www.transboundarywaters.orst.edu/database/DatabaseIntro.html Transboundary Freshwater Dispute Database], Department of Geosciences, Oregon State University. Additional information about the TFDD can be found at: http://www.transboundarywaters.orst.edu/research/case_studies/Kura_Arkas_New.htm </ref> | |Description=The reason that Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia are being forced to confront the issue of the Kura-Araks River is because of problems of pollution. The river is heavily contaminated by chemical, industrial, biological, agricultural and radioactive pollutants. The failure of wastewater treatment plants plays a major role in this dilemma in that the actual amount of water that is being treated is less than a decade ago. The concentrations of contaminants in the Kura-Araks reach levels that are much higher than standards in any of the three countries or internationally as well. Azerbaijan, the downstream nation, and lacking groundwater resources like Georgia or Armenia, depends on the Kura-Araks for the majority of its agricultural, industrial and household use.<ref name = "TFDD 2012">Product of the [http://www.transboundarywaters.orst.edu/database/DatabaseIntro.html Transboundary Freshwater Dispute Database], Department of Geosciences, Oregon State University. Additional information about the TFDD can be found at: http://www.transboundarywaters.orst.edu/research/case_studies/Kura_Arkas_New.htm </ref> | ||
| − | |External Links= | + | |External Links={{External Link |
| + | |Link Text=Transboundary Freshwater Dispute Database (TFDD) (2012). Oregon State University. Kura Araks River Basin Case Study | ||
| + | |Link Address=http://www.transboundarywaters.orst.edu/research/case_studies/Kura_Arkas_New.htm | ||
| + | |Link Description=[http://www.transboundarywaters.orst.edu/database/DatabaseIntro.html The Transboundary Freshwater Dispute Database] (TFDD) is used to aid in the assessment of the process of water conflict prevention and resolution. Over the years we have developed this Transboundary Freshwater Dispute Database, a project of the Oregon State University Department of Geosciences, in collaboration with the Northwest Alliance for Computational Science and Engineering. | ||
| + | }} | ||
|Case Review={{Case Review Boxes | |Case Review={{Case Review Boxes | ||
|Empty Section=No | |Empty Section=No | ||
| Line 11: | Line 15: | ||
|Wikify=No | |Wikify=No | ||
|connect to www=No | |connect to www=No | ||
| + | |Out of Date=No | ||
|Disputed=No | |Disputed=No | ||
|Mpov=No | |Mpov=No | ||
}} | }} | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 13:18, 5 December 2012
Kura-Araks River Facts
Contents
The reason that Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia are being forced to confront the issue of the Kura-Araks River is because of problems of pollution. The river is heavily contaminated by chemical, industrial, biological, agricultural and radioactive pollutants. The failure of wastewater treatment plants plays a major role in this dilemma in that the actual amount of water that is being treated is less than a decade ago. The concentrations of contaminants in the Kura-Araks reach levels that are much higher than standards in any of the three countries or internationally as well. Azerbaijan, the downstream nation, and lacking groundwater resources like Georgia or Armenia, depends on the Kura-Araks for the majority of its agricultural, industrial and household use.[1]
Case Studies linked to Kura-Araks River
Articles linked to Kura-Araks River
| Riparians | Water Features |
|---|---|
|
|
|
| Projects and Initiatives | Agreements and Treaties |
|---|---|
|
|
|
External Links
- Transboundary Freshwater Dispute Database (TFDD) (2012). Oregon State University. Kura Araks River Basin Case Study — The Transboundary Freshwater Dispute Database (TFDD) is used to aid in the assessment of the process of water conflict prevention and resolution. Over the years we have developed this Transboundary Freshwater Dispute Database, a project of the Oregon State University Department of Geosciences, in collaboration with the Northwest Alliance for Computational Science and Engineering.
- ^ Product of the Transboundary Freshwater Dispute Database, Department of Geosciences, Oregon State University. Additional information about the TFDD can be found at: http://www.transboundarywaters.orst.edu/research/case_studies/Kura_Arkas_New.htm
