Difference between revisions of "Kura-Araks River"
| [checked revision] | [checked revision] |
Mpritchard (Talk | contribs) |
Mpritchard (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Water Feature | {{Water Feature | ||
| − | |Type= | + | |Type=river/stream/creek |
| − | |Length= | + | |Length=1,072 |
| − | | | + | |Description=The reason that Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia are being forced to confront the issue of the Kura-Araks River is because of problems of pollution. The river is heavily contaminated by chemical, industrial, biological, agricultural and radioactive pollutants. The failure of wastewater treatment plants plays a major role in this dilemma in that the actual amount of water that is being treated is less than a decade ago. The concentrations of contaminants in the Kura-Araks reach levels that are much higher than standards in any of the three countries or internationally as well. Azerbaijan, the downstream nation, and lacking groundwater resources like Georgia or Armenia, depends on the Kura-Araks for the majority of its agricultural, industrial and household use.<ref name = "TFDD 2012">Product of the [http://www.transboundarywaters.orst.edu/database/DatabaseIntro.html Transboundary Freshwater Dispute Database], Department of Geosciences, Oregon State University. Additional information about the TFDD can be found at: http://www.transboundarywaters.orst.edu/research/case_studies/Kura_Arkas_New.htm </ref> |
| − | + | ||
|External Links= | |External Links= | ||
| − | |Case Review= | + | |Case Review={{Case Review Boxes |
| + | |Empty Section=No | ||
| + | |Clean Up Required=No | ||
| + | |Expand Section=No | ||
| + | |Add References=No | ||
| + | |Wikify=No | ||
| + | |connect to www=No | ||
| + | |Disputed=No | ||
| + | |Mpov=No | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 14:34, 9 August 2012
Kura-Araks River Facts
Type:river/stream/creek"River/stream/creek" is not in the list of possible values (watershed or basin, river or creek, lake, reservoir, aquifer, wetland, bayou or swamp, estuary, bay, sea and ocean or other saline water body, non-specified fresh water feature) for this property.
view/browse all article properties
The reason that Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia are being forced to confront the issue of the Kura-Araks River is because of problems of pollution. The river is heavily contaminated by chemical, industrial, biological, agricultural and radioactive pollutants. The failure of wastewater treatment plants plays a major role in this dilemma in that the actual amount of water that is being treated is less than a decade ago. The concentrations of contaminants in the Kura-Araks reach levels that are much higher than standards in any of the three countries or internationally as well. Azerbaijan, the downstream nation, and lacking groundwater resources like Georgia or Armenia, depends on the Kura-Araks for the majority of its agricultural, industrial and household use.[1]
Case Studies linked to Kura-Araks River
Articles linked to Kura-Araks River
| Riparians | Water Features |
|---|---|
|
|
|
| Projects and Initiatives | Agreements and Treaties |
|---|---|
|
|
|
- ^ Product of the Transboundary Freshwater Dispute Database, Department of Geosciences, Oregon State University. Additional information about the TFDD can be found at: http://www.transboundarywaters.orst.edu/research/case_studies/Kura_Arkas_New.htm
