Difference between revisions of "Form:Case Study"
From AquaPedia Case Study Database
Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
=Economic, Regional, and Political Framework= | =Economic, Regional, and Political Framework= | ||
{| class="formtable" | {| class="formtable" | ||
− | {{{field|REP Framework|input type=textarea| | + | {{{field|REP Framework|input type=textarea|rows=50|cols=100|placeholder=Longstanding political, social, economic, and other factors play a significant role in shaping water issues for any region. Please discuss any background topics that are important for understanding how the issues of this case interact.|editor=wikieditor}}} |
|} | |} | ||
=Key Questions= | =Key Questions= | ||
Line 97: | Line 97: | ||
result adds to previous knowledge. | result adds to previous knowledge. | ||
{| class="formtable" | {| class="formtable" | ||
− | {{{field|Abstract|input type=textarea| | + | {{{field|Abstract|input type=textarea|rows=15|cols=100|editor=wikieditor}}} |
|} | |} | ||
Line 109: | Line 109: | ||
to anyone in any discipline. | to anyone in any discipline. | ||
{| class="formtable" | {| class="formtable" | ||
− | {{{field|Questions and Wisdom|input type=textarea| | + | {{{field|Questions and Wisdom|input type=textarea|rows=15|cols=100|editor=wikieditor}}} |
|} | |} | ||
{{{end template}}} | {{{end template}}} | ||
Line 148: | Line 148: | ||
! Analysis: | ! Analysis: | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | {{{field|Analysis|input type=textarea| | + | | {{{field|Analysis|input type=textarea|rows=15|cols=100|editor=wikieditor|placeholder=One of the most powerful tools for representing functional relationships among large numbers of interconnected components is network analysis. A network (or graph) is a collection of nodes (vertices) and links (edges) between the nodes. What natural, societal, and political processes and variables were most important in this case? Can you “map” their relationships to each other? Network maps can be provided as scanned hand-made drawings or digitally produced images.}}} |
|- | |- | ||
! Synthesis: | ! Synthesis: | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | {{{field|Synthesis|input type=textarea| | + | | {{{field|Synthesis|input type=textarea|rows=15|cols=100|editor=wikieditor|placeholder=Synthesize the information you have presented to draw conclusions and highlight important issues and lessons learned. Provide your insight on what knowledge/wisdom from this case can be transferred to other settings}}} |
|} {{{field|User|hidden|default=current user}}} | |} {{{field|User|hidden|default=current user}}} | ||
{{{end template}}} | {{{end template}}} |
Revision as of 19:33, 13 June 2012
Add the title for your case study. Please choose a title that is descriptive about the setting and purpose for your case:
Example Titles:
- Water Quality Control of the South-to-North Water Diversion (SNWD) Middle Route Project (MRP)
- Hydropower development in the Nam Ngum River Basin
- Can Agricultural Policy Help Save Water and Money in the Apalachicola-Chattahoochee-Flint River Basin?
If there is an existing case study with the same title, you will be sent to a page for editing the existing case.