Difference between revisions of "Form:Case Study"
From AquaPedia Case Study Database
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
=Economic, Regional, and Political Framework= | =Economic, Regional, and Political Framework= | ||
{{{field|REP Framework|holds template}}} | {{{field|REP Framework|holds template}}} | ||
| + | =Key Questions= | ||
| + | The greatest value of any case study is the ability to identify transferable knowledge, | ||
| + | particularly identifying the context and usefulness of this knowledge. Select a few | ||
| + | questions from the question bank and provide a brief synopsis on the contributions | ||
| + | this case study makes to providing more insight or answering this question. | ||
| + | {{{field|Key Questions|holds template}}} | ||
=Issues and Stakeholders= | =Issues and Stakeholders= | ||
Issues are concerns of groups of stakeholders within the context of the water basin and the case study. | Issues are concerns of groups of stakeholders within the context of the water basin and the case study. | ||
| Line 34: | Line 40: | ||
the interactions between the issues you defined in the previous section. | the interactions between the issues you defined in the previous section. | ||
{{{field|Analysis and Synthesis|holds template}}} | {{{field|Analysis and Synthesis|holds template}}} | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
=Summary= | =Summary= | ||
{{{field|Case Study Summary|holds template}}} | {{{field|Case Study Summary|holds template}}} | ||
Revision as of 09:45, 1 June 2012
