Information for "Geopolitics of South China Sea: The Arbitral Tribunal"


Jump to: navigation, search

Basic information

Display titleGeopolitics of South China Sea: The Arbitral Tribunal
Default sort keyGeopolitics of South China Sea: The Arbitral Tribunal
Page length (in bytes)67,031
Page ID2330
Page content languageEnglish (en)
Page content modelwikitext
Indexing by robotsAllowed
Number of views21,634
Number of redirects to this page0
Counted as a content pageYes

Page protection

EditAllow all users
MoveAllow all users

Edit history

Page creatorPjular (Talk | contribs)
Date of page creation07:45, 25 May 2017
Latest editorPjular (Talk | contribs)
Date of latest edit17:09, 30 May 2017
Total number of edits47
Total number of distinct authors1
Recent number of edits (within past 91 days)0
Recent number of distinct authors0

Page properties

Magic word (1)
  • __NOEDITSECTION__
Transcluded templates (10)

Templates used on this page:

Retrieved from "http://aquapedia.waterdiplomacy.org/wiki/index.php/Geopolitics_of_South_China_Sea:_The_Arbitral_Tribunal"
Facts about "Geopolitics of South China Sea: The Arbitral Tribunal"RDF feed
AgreementUNCLOS +, Declaration on the Conduct of Parties (DOC) + and Code of Conduct (COC) +
Area3,685,000 km² (1,422,778.5 mi²) +
ClimateMoist tropical (Köppen A-type) + and Monsoon +
Geolocation15° 12' 12.1024", 114° 29' 13.7476"Latitude: 15.2033617681
Longitude: 114.4871521 +
IssueThe ‘Nine-Dash Line’ claimed by China has … The ‘Nine-Dash Line’ claimed by China has caused an international competition over territorial sovereign rights and natural resources associated with overlapping maritime delimitation in the South China sea. The conflict has tarnished collaborations between China and ASEAN nations including the Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia, Indonesia, Brunei as well as Taiwan and Japan. The paper specifically focuses on the conflict between China and the Philippines which have arisen since early 1970s over islands and reefs and has been escalated by the recent arbitral tribunal procedure.Following the warships confrontation, the Philippines brought the conflict against China to an interstate arbitration in January 2013 which was opposed by the defendant State as a breach to the ASEAN-China Declaration of the Conduct of Parties in The South China Sea and bilateral joint agreement made between the nations in 2002 and 2011 consecutively. China and the ASEAN claimants posed different views on the international dispute resolution through the compulsory arbitration system based on the United Nation Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) Annex VII. To defend their interests through legal framework, China uphold the regulation of the customary international law for the historical rights whereas the ASEAN nations followed the revised regulations implemented by the United Nation Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). This divide impedes the attempt for negotiation and increase tensions over the dispute, muting the communication between states., muting the communication between states. +
Key QuestionHow can mutual trust amongst riparians be nurtured? What actions erode that trust? + and What kinds of water treaties or agreements between countries can provide sufficient structure and stability to ensure enforceability but also be flexible and adaptable given future uncertainties? +
Land Useindustrial use + and mining operations +
NSPDGovernance +, Assets + and Values and Norms +
Population2,000,000,000 million +
RiparianChina +, Vietnam + and The Philippines +
Stakeholder TypeSovereign state/national/federal government +, Supranational union + and Non-legislative governmental agency +
Topic Tagsovereignty arbitration south china sea UNCLOS historical rights +
Water FeatureSea + and Indo-Pacific +
Water UseFisheries - wild +, Industry - non-consumptive use + and Mining/Extraction support +
Has subobjectThis property is a special property in this wiki.Geopolitics of South China Sea: The Arbitral Tribunal + and Geopolitics of South China Sea: The Arbitral Tribunal +