Edit Help: Help:Content validity

Enter the article content below. Help articles should be focused and short. Please link or transclude other help articles where relevant. Provide examples or screenshots where helpful.

It is important that all information provided to an AquaPedia case study is *clear *consise *accurate as possible Most case study sections require a neutral or balanced point of view, as any user can edit and improve content. Individual ASI articles linked to specific case studies allow individual contributors (authors) to provide qualified statements, researched opinions, and other non-neutral information, insight, or wisdom on a topic. Cases or Case Sections that do not *provide sufficient references *appear to be neutrally presented may be flagged by a another user as requiring additional fact-checking, edits for clarity/factuality, or other improvements to improve the validity of the content.

Provide a summary of the type/purpose of updates you have made. This summary is displayed on the "History" tab for the page and is not part of the page as it is viewed:

This is a minor edit Watch this page

Cancel