You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reason:
You are not allowed to execute the action you have requested.
While the historical, geographical and scientific facts involved in a water management problem or water conflict can often be attributed to well-respected sources and agreed upon by multiple parties, each problem can also have multiple facets and not all issues may be considered equally important by all parties. Certain perspectives may interpret the implications of neutral facts in a different way from others.
Because of this, each case study can be linked to multiple articles in which contributors can provide analysis or insights and synthesis different viewpoints or lines of evidence. Professionals, academics, and community-members who have some involvement with the case first hand might have different experiences or interpretations to share. The goal is to collect a wide range of knowledge on these cases, which requires incorporating multiple (and sometimes conflicting) viewpoints into each case.
Each of these Analysis, Synthesis, & Insights (ASI) sections is protected -- only the user who created the section, official editors, and administrators have the ability to change the content in an individual ASI. Editors who take on the task of editing a user-contributed ASI section are committed to only adjust grammar and stylistic issues, and will avoid any changes that could lead to a different meaning or adjust content.
We suggest that anyone who would like to help improve an ASI section leave comments for the author and community on the discussion page for the specific ASI section. If you have questions about how this works, please refer to the help section or contact a site administrator.
Aaron T. Wolf Enter the contributor's name and (optional) link to a descriptive website, such as a professional bio or AquaPedia user page.
Joshua T. Newton Enter the contributor's name and (optional) link to a descriptive website, such as a professional bio or AquaPedia user page.
Matthew Pritchard Enter the contributor's name and (optional) link to a descriptive website, such as a professional bio or AquaPedia user page.
Enter the contributor's name and (optional) link to a descriptive website, such as a professional bio or AquaPedia user page.
Link to Case Study :
Summary - Displayed only in Case Study:
Image Upload - open the image upload page in a new tab: Upload a File View all Files You can find or upload a file and then return here.
ASI - Extended Article Content ''The points below are summarized or excerpted from the Oregon State University Transboundary Freshwater Dispute Database (TFDD). Matthew Pritchard provided this and other summarized analysis or insights from the TFFD on behalf and with permission of the original authors. Available on-line at: http://www.transboundarywaters.orst.edu/'' == Lessons Learned == *If riparian states start cooperation from the outset of a conflict, instead of letting it create stronger positions, the economic and joint management prospects are much greater. :Since 1969, the quantity of joint economic ventures in the La Plata Basin has allowed for increased cooperation between the riparian nations when many times conflict could have arisen and defeated the benefits the states are receiving today. <ref name="TFDD"> Oregon State University Transboundary Freshwater Dispute Database (TFDD) (2012). http://www.transboundarywaters.orst.edu/ </ref> *If riparian states agree to equal access to transboundary water resources, equal and joint management, investment and distribution of that resource is feasible. :In the water resources sector, neither Brazil nor Argentina has used their economic or military superiority to maintain greater control over water resources or hydroelectric potential. <ref name="TFDD"/> == Creative Outcomes Resulting From Resolution Process == The La Plata Basin Treaty has helped bring the five nations together and aid in not their own disputes, but assist in resolving disputes between sectors. The nations cooperate well, but the treaty has been helpful to resolve intersectorial conflicts. While the Hydrovia project was proposed in 1988, even now in 2004, there is still little movement towards implementing the project due to environmental and social action groups in defending the economic, cultural and ecological integrity of the basin. In the end, this will allow for a more sustainable project.<ref name="TFDD"/>
Practitioner Academic Participant Observer
Analysis Synthesis Personal Insights Professional Insights
Keywords
Help others find your ASI by providing keywords or short phrases. Selecting the arrow or entering a few letters will show you keywords others have used to describe their contributions
Provide a summary of the type/purpose of updates you have made. This summary is displayed on the "History" tab for the page and is not part of the page as it is viewed:
This is a minor edit Watch this page
Cancel