You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reason:
You are not allowed to execute the action you have requested.
While the historical, geographical and scientific facts involved in a water management problem or water conflict can often be attributed to well-respected sources and agreed upon by multiple parties, each problem can also have multiple facets and not all issues may be considered equally important by all parties. Certain perspectives may interpret the implications of neutral facts in a different way from others.
Because of this, each case study can be linked to multiple articles in which contributors can provide analysis or insights and synthesis different viewpoints or lines of evidence. Professionals, academics, and community-members who have some involvement with the case first hand might have different experiences or interpretations to share. The goal is to collect a wide range of knowledge on these cases, which requires incorporating multiple (and sometimes conflicting) viewpoints into each case.
Each of these Analysis, Synthesis, & Insights (ASI) sections is protected -- only the user who created the section, official editors, and administrators have the ability to change the content in an individual ASI. Editors who take on the task of editing a user-contributed ASI section are committed to only adjust grammar and stylistic issues, and will avoid any changes that could lead to a different meaning or adjust content.
We suggest that anyone who would like to help improve an ASI section leave comments for the author and community on the discussion page for the specific ASI section. If you have questions about how this works, please refer to the help section or contact a site administrator.
Aaron T. Wolf Enter the contributor's name and (optional) link to a descriptive website, such as a professional bio or AquaPedia user page.
Joshua T. Newton Enter the contributor's name and (optional) link to a descriptive website, such as a professional bio or AquaPedia user page.
Matthew Pritchard Enter the contributor's name and (optional) link to a descriptive website, such as a professional bio or AquaPedia user page.
Enter the contributor's name and (optional) link to a descriptive website, such as a professional bio or AquaPedia user page.
Link to Case Study :
Summary - Displayed only in Case Study:
Image Upload - open the image upload page in a new tab: Upload a File View all Files You can find or upload a file and then return here.
ASI - Extended Article Content ''The points below are summarized or excerpted from the Oregon State University Transboundary Freshwater Dispute Database (TFDD). Matthew Pritchard provided this and other summarized analysis or insights from the TFFD on behalf and with permission of the original authors. Available on-line at: http://www.transboundarywaters.orst.edu/'' === Lessons Learned === *Even with power disparity, there is possibility for agreement over water resources through economic benefits. :South Africa is a much more powerful nation than Lesotho, but Lesotho has abundant water resources, which, through the Highlands Project, will benefit both nations economically and through the provision of water to South Africa. It is possible even when there is such a wide gap between nations in terms of power, to collaborate for the mutual gain of both countries. <ref name="tfdd"> Oregon State University Transboundary Freshwater Dispute Database Available on-line at: http://www.transboundarywaters.orst.edu/ </ref> *It is more economically sound to begin impact studies before nations start to construct projects. :It was shown through the Lesotho Highlands Water Project that if impact studies are started after the initiation of a major hydro-project, the costs for the project go up as necessary components for the project may not have been considered pre-study. For the Phase II of the LHWP, studies are being conducted to judge the feasibility of a project that was designed more than 15 years to ago to investigate in a more comprehensive manner the possible impacts of the project. <ref name="tfdd" /> *Renegotiation clauses in an agreement can prevent issues from arising for the nations involved. :The LHWP treaty also exemplifies the importance of providing for renegotiation of project terms. In the absence of such a provision, the additional phases of the project might have been implemented without adequate consideration of their feasibility <ref name="tfdd" /> == Creative Outcomes Resulting From Resolution Process == The Lesotho Highlands Water Project provides lessons in the importance of an integrated approach to negotiating the allocation of a "basket" of resources. South Africa receives cost-effective water for its continued growth, while Lesotho receives revenue and hydropower for its own development. <ref name="tfdd" />
Practitioner Academic Participant Observer
Analysis Synthesis Personal Insights Professional Insights
Keywords
Help others find your ASI by providing keywords or short phrases. Selecting the arrow or entering a few letters will show you keywords others have used to describe their contributions
Provide a summary of the type/purpose of updates you have made. This summary is displayed on the "History" tab for the page and is not part of the page as it is viewed:
This is a minor edit Watch this page
Cancel