Edit ASI: ASI:Ganges Basin: insights from the Transboundary Freshwater Dispute Database

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reason:

You are not allowed to execute the action you have requested.

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reason:

You are not allowed to execute the action you have requested.

While the historical, geographical and scientific facts involved in a water management problem or water conflict can often be attributed to well-respected sources and agreed upon by multiple parties, each problem can also have multiple facets and not all issues may be considered equally important by all parties. Certain perspectives may interpret the implications of neutral facts in a different way from others.

Because of this, each case study can be linked to multiple articles in which contributors can provide analysis or insights and synthesis different viewpoints or lines of evidence. Professionals, academics, and community-members who have some involvement with the case first hand might have different experiences or interpretations to share. The goal is to collect a wide range of knowledge on these cases, which requires incorporating multiple (and sometimes conflicting) viewpoints into each case.

Each of these Analysis, Synthesis, & Insights (ASI) sections is protected -- only the user who created the section, official editors, and administrators have the ability to change the content in an individual ASI. Editors who take on the task of editing a user-contributed ASI section are committed to only adjust grammar and stylistic issues, and will avoid any changes that could lead to a different meaning or adjust content.

We suggest that anyone who would like to help improve an ASI section leave comments for the author and community on the discussion page for the specific ASI section. If you have questions about how this works, please refer to the help section or contact a site administrator.

[edit]

Contributors
ASI Content
About this ASI

Enter the contributor's name and (optional) link to a descriptive website, such as a professional bio or AquaPedia user page.

Link to Case Study :

ASI articles need to be linked to a specific case study. If the case title above is not correct, you can select a different case.

Summary - Displayed only in Case Study:

Image Upload - open the image upload page in a new tab:
Upload a File View all Files
You can find or upload a file and then return here.

To insert an image in your text, type: [[File:filename.jpg]]

ASI - Extended Article Content ''The points below are summarized or excerpted from the Oregon State University Transboundary Freshwater Dispute Database (TFDD). Matthew Pritchard provided this and other summarized analysis or insights from the TFFD on behalf and with permission of the original authors. Available on-line at: http://www.transboundarywaters.orst.edu/'' ==Lessons Learned == * Unequal power relationships, without strong third-party involvement, create strong dis-incentives for cooperation. * India, the stronger party both Geo-strategically and hydro-strategically, has little incentive to reach agreement with Bangladesh. Without strong third-party involvement, such as that of the World Bank between India and Pakistan on the Indus, the dispute has gone on for years. * Requests for increasingly detailed data clarifications can be an effective delaying tactic. * Agreeing on the minimum data necessary for a solution, or delegating the task of data-gathering to a third party may speed the pace of negotiations. India used the veracity and detail of data as an effective tactic in postponing a long-term solution with Bangladesh. Interestingly, India was able to surmount this problem on the Indus by stipulating that data could be used in an agreement, without agreeing to its accuracy. * Likewise, insisting on bilateral negotiations, as opposed to watershed-wide negotiations, favors the party with greater power. * India has insisted on separate negotiations with each of the riparians of its international rivers. It was thus able to come to arrangements with Nepal on Ganges tributaries without considering Bangladeshi needs. * Agreeing early on the appropriate diplomatic level for negotiations is an important step in the pre-negotiation phase. * Much of the negotiations between India and Pakistan and, later, India and Bangladesh, were spent trying to resolve the question of what was the appropriate diplomatic level for negotiations. :Short-term agreements which stipulate that the terms are not permanent can be useful steps in long-term solutions. However, a mechanism for continuation of the temporary agreement in the absence of a long-term agreement is crucial. :Agreements on the distribution of Ganges waters have been short in duration, providing initial impetus for signing, but providing difficulties when they lapse. ==Creative outcomes resulting from resolution process== The 1977 Ganges Waters Agreement was reached perhaps more quickly specifically as a short-term agreement, and specifying that it was not establishing any precedents.

Perspective(s)
Selecting any of these choices expresses to to the reader what perspective you feel that you are taking by adding your analysis, synthesis, or insight. If you want to share more on your specific expertise, consider updating your user page with additional details about your professional and academic background. Practitioner Academic Participant Observer
Contribution Type(s):
Selecting any of these choices expresses to to the reader whether you consider your contribution to be primarily academic, professional, or personal in nature, or a combination of these types. Analysis Synthesis Personal Insights Professional Insights

Keywords

Help others find your ASI by providing keywords or short phrases. Selecting the arrow or entering a few letters will show you keywords others have used to describe their contributions

Add Keywords or phrases (no special characters or punctuation)

Provide a summary of the type/purpose of updates you have made. This summary is displayed on the "History" tab for the page and is not part of the page as it is viewed:

This is a minor edit Watch this page

Cancel

Edit ASI: ASI:Ganges Basin: insights from the Transboundary Freshwater Dispute Database

Navigation menu

Personal tools

Namespaces

Variants

Views

Actions

Search

Explore

Learn More

Advanced