Browse by Attribute

Case Study > Natural, Societal & Political Domain Variables: Values and Norms & Water Use: Fisheries - wild

Click on one or more items below to narrow your results.

Natural, Societal & Political Domain Variables: (Click arrow to add another value)

- Assets - Ecosystems - Governance - Values and Norms - Water Quality - Water Quantity - Other - None

Climate:

- Dry-winter (1) - Humid mid-latitude (Köppen C-type) (1) - Moist tropical (Köppen A-type) (1) - Monsoon (2) - Semi-arid/steppe (Köppen B-type) (2) - alpine (1) - cold-climate (permafrost, tundra, polar) (1)

Land Use:

- agricultural- cropland and pasture (4) - conservation lands (4) - forest land (3) - industrial use (4) - mining operations (2) - rangeland (2) - religious/cultural sites (3) - urban (4)

Water Use: (Click arrow to add another value)

- Agriculture or Irrigation - Domestic/Urban Supply - Fisheries - farmed - Fisheries - wild - Hydropower Generation - Industry - consumptive use - Industry - non-consumptive use - Livestock - Mining/Extraction support - Other Ecological Services - Recreation or Tourism - Other - None

Stakeholder Type:

- Community or organized citizens (7) - Cultural Interest (3) - Development/humanitarian interest (3) - Environmental interest (6) - Federated state/territorial/provincial government (7) - Industry/Corporate Interest (5) - Local Government (4) - Non-legislative governmental agency (7) - Sovereign state/national/federal government (7) - Supranational union (2)

Key Question:

- How can consultation and cooperation among stakeholders and development partners be better facilitated/managed/fostered? (1) - How can mutual trust amongst riparians be nurtured? What actions erode that trust? (1) - How do issues of equity and development impact the identification of stakeholders in cases involving hydropower or other revenue generating water infrastructure? (1) - How do national policies influence water use at the local level? (1) - How does asymmetry of power influence water negotiations and how can the negative effects be mitigated? (1) - To what extent can international actors and movements from civil society influence water management? How and when is this beneficial/detrimental and how can these effects be supported/mitigated? (2) - What considerations can be given to incorporating collaborative adaptive management (CAM)? What efforts have the parties made to review and adjust a solution or decision over time in light of changing conditions? (2) - What kinds of water treaties or agreements between countries can provide sufficient structure and stability to ensure enforceability but also be flexible and adaptable given future uncertainties? (3) - What mechanisms beyond simple allocation can be incorporated into transboundary water agreements to add value and facilitate resolution? (2) - What role(s) can hydropower play in a nation's energy strategy? (1) - Where does the benefit “flow” from a hydropower project and how does that affect implementation and sustainability of the project? (1)

Showing below up to 9 results in range #1 to #9.

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)