Browse by Attribute

Case Study > Land Use: mining operations & Water Use: Agriculture or Irrigation

Click on one or more items below to narrow your results.

Natural, Societal & Political Domain Variables:

- Assets (2) - Ecosystems (3) - Governance (2) - Values and Norms (1) - Water Quality (4) - Water Quantity (1)

Climate:

- Arid/desert (Köppen B-type) (3) - Continental (Köppen D-type) (2) - Dry-summer (2) - Dry-winter (2) - Humid mid-latitude (Köppen C-type) (2) - Moist (2) - Moist tropical (Köppen A-type) (2) - Monsoon (1) - Semi-arid/steppe (Köppen B-type) (3) - alpine (2) - cold-climate (permafrost, tundra, polar) (1) - temperate (3)

Land Use: (Click arrow to add another value)

- agricultural- confined livestock operations - agricultural- cropland and pasture - conservation lands - forest land - industrial use - mining operations - rangeland - religious/cultural sites - urban - urban- high density - Other - None

Water Use: (Click arrow to add another value)

- Agriculture or Irrigation - Domestic/Urban Supply - Fisheries - farmed - Fisheries - wild - Hydropower Generation - Industry - consumptive use - Industry - non-consumptive use - Livestock - Mining/Extraction support - Other Ecological Services - Recreation or Tourism - Other - None

Stakeholder Type:

- Community or organized citizens (3) - Environmental interest (3) - Federated state/territorial/provincial government (1) - Industry/Corporate Interest (4) - Non-legislative governmental agency (3) - Sovereign state/national/federal government (5)

Key Question:

- How can costs for water quality projects be distributed between polluters and beneficiaries? (1) - How can increasing urban water demand be balanced between the needs of the urban population and industry? (1) - How does asymmetry of power influence water negotiations and how can the negative effects be mitigated? (1) - To what extent can international actors and movements from civil society influence water management? How and when is this beneficial/detrimental and how can these effects be supported/mitigated? (1) - What considerations can be given to incorporating collaborative adaptive management (CAM)? What efforts have the parties made to review and adjust a solution or decision over time in light of changing conditions? (1) - What mechanisms beyond simple allocation can be incorporated into transboundary water agreements to add value and facilitate resolution? (1)

Showing below up to 6 results in range #1 to #6.

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

View (previous 250 | next 250) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)